What are the anti-traditional contents in Qian Xuantong?

The contribution of money to the new culture movement is obvious. The most obvious fact is that the punctuation marks, Arabic numerals and horizontal arrangement of Chinese characters that we are familiar with and widely used today were first put forward by Qian, which is the result of Qian's "efforts to promote vernacular Chinese". Although times have changed, it is hard for today's readers to recall that money laid the foundation for this cause, not to mention that punctuation marks and common horizontal Chinese characters used in our daily life were written by this famous phonologist. However, how to evaluate the position of money in the new culture movement depends on people's evaluation. Chen Duxiu published "On Literary Revolution" in No.6 of New Youth, Volume 2, published on February 19 17, and Qian published an open letter of "My humble opinion on literary improvement and the response to China literature course of liberal arts in universities", which put forward eight characters for the first time: "Choosing studies is evil and Tongcheng is fallacy". After Qian Wen came out, Chen Duxiu was greatly encouraged. He thought, "Why worry about the whole country?" When "can float a big picture for the literary world". Hu Shi felt that he had met a bosom friend. "Qian was a master of Chinese studies, Zhang Taiyan. He praised this article written by an international student to discuss the improvement of China literature, but I was flattered. " He said: "Professor Qian is a master of ancient Chinese prose. His sympathetic response to us really gave us a boost. " (Oral Autobiography of Hu Shi) Qian Zhongshu's father Qian Jibo also thinks that Hu Shi advocates new literature because he is "enthusiastic" because of the support of the rich. The author thinks that the two flag-bearers of the New Culture Movement, Chen Duxiu and Hu Shi, are almost grateful for their comments and statements, which are fair and fully show that money has played a mainstay role in this movement. The author speculates that Qian is not only a proud disciple of Zhang Taiyan, a famous ancient prose master, but also a famous professor in Peking University, and his status and social prestige are naturally extraordinary. More importantly, at that time, in fact, Zhang Men and his younger brothers were excellent. They gathered in Beijing, especially in Peking University, and their strength was magnificent. Professor Sang Bing believes that, in fact, to a large extent, almost all of Peking University's younger brothers at that time had the ability to have the final say, so it is conceivable that few people in academic circles dared to challenge Zhang Menbing at that time. Although Zhang Men's disciples are not necessarily United, and most of them, like Huang Kan, do not necessarily agree with the cause of money, but they will not openly oppose money because of their friendship with teachers. On the other hand, the general old school can attack Chen Duxiu and Hu Shi for their lack of education, and expect a positive response from the academic circles at that time. The money for participating in the new culture movement is completely different. He knows China well, so the old guard can't attack him in this respect. In my opinion, it is these two reasons that make the contribution of money to the New Culture Movement almost appreciated by the two standard-bearers. If this inference is reasonable, then money's participation in the new culture movement will definitely have a vital impact on the prospect of this movement.