Video analysis of Liverpool lottery

There are some controversies about the two fouls of pickford and Richard Ellison in the Merseyside Derby and the controversial penalty of VAR in the final. By reading and understanding the original rules and the referee's operation manual, it is very obvious whether the penalty is correct or not.

As for pickford, his actions are actually obvious. It should have been a normal stretching and blocking action. As a result, it came out slowly and came out late, so it was deformed and hurt Van Dyke. To tell the truth, even in the normal live broadcast time, it is difficult to get a red card, not to mention after Van Dyke was offside-if Van Dyke offside made an opponent's foul, then he was offside to participate in the attack. If the offside dead ball is not violent, the referee will not whistle. Pickford's action, if it happens during the live broadcast of the ball, is a relatively standard "reckless" action and should be warned by a yellow card.

Conclusion: pickford's actions are either "dirty" or simply disgusting.

Richard Ellison is in the back. It's really ugly. Although he finally realized that he was sure to shovel, he rarely took back some of his actions, regardless of the traces, but when he shoveled the ball for the first time, he was obviously farther away from the ball and had little chance of damage. Although the injury was not as big as pickford's, it was a standard "excessive use of force" in terms of action nature, and the referee was very decisive. He managed to let Charleston die on the ground for a long time, but he still failed to escape the red card.

Conclusion: Richard Ellison's movements were dirty from the beginning, and even if he wanted to take them away, he couldn't take them away at last.

Finally, the punishment of VAR is really meaningless-this is also an extreme case of using VAR. When such a body hair level is offside, it is actually inappropriate to use VAR. Simply understood, passing the ball offside instantly sounds like a very clear definition, but it is not. If the "passing moment" is an accurately defined moment, it can be clear whether it is offside. But in reality, the "passing moment" is likely to be more than one frame (from the time the passer touches the ball to the time when the ball completely leaves the foot), which leads to that the frame selected by VAR can completely control offside or not.

Conclusion: This is why there is a "clear and obvious" regulation on the use conditions of VAR, and opening VAR at the last minute of the Merseyside Derby is actually completely out of compliance.