How to refund the deposit for public rental housing?
If the lease contract does not specify the nature or rules of the deposit, the deposit will be regarded as the lease advance payment and will be refunded anyway.
The people's court shall not support the payment of retention money, deposit, deposit, contract money, deposit or deposit, but there is no agreement on the nature of the deposit.
(2) Unless otherwise agreed in the contract, the landlord shall refund the deposit when the lease relationship is terminated.
Unless otherwise agreed in the contract, the lessor shall return the lease deposit in full to the lessee without interest the day after the lease relationship is terminated and the lessee has moved out, cleared up and paid all the payable expenses. If there is any property loss during the rental period, the deposit can be deducted accordingly, and the deposit should be refunded after deducting the property loss. In the absence of a clear agreement on the nature of the deposit, the role of the deposit is to set a guarantee for the house and the property therein. If the lessor's house and indoor facilities are damaged during the lease period, it will be deducted from the deposit.
(3) If no losses are caused as agreed in the contract, it shall be returned at the termination of the contract.
If no losses are caused, the contract shall be returned upon expiration or termination. The problem of non-refundable lease deposit can be solved by both parties through consultation. If negotiation fails, you can collect evidence and bring a lawsuit to the court. If the lease contract does not specify the nature or rules of the deposit, the deposit will be regarded as the lease advance payment and will be refunded anyway.
Legal basis: Article 200 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), if the application of a party meets one of the following circumstances, the people's court shall try again: (1) there is new evidence enough to overturn the original judgment or ruling; (two) the basic facts identified in the original judgment or ruling lack evidence to prove; (3) The main evidence of the facts ascertained in the original judgment or ruling is forged; (four) the main evidence of the facts identified in the original judgment or ruling has not been cross-examined; (five) the main evidence needed for the trial of the case, the parties can not collect it by themselves due to objective reasons, and apply in writing to the people's court for investigation and collection, but the people's court has not investigated and collected it; (6) The application of the law in the original judgment or ruling is indeed wrong; (seven) the composition of the judicial organization is illegal or the judges who should be avoided according to law have not avoided; (8) A person without capacity for litigation has no legal representative, or a party who should participate in the litigation fails to participate in the litigation due to reasons not attributable to him or his agent ad litem. (nine) in violation of the law, depriving the parties of the right to debate; (ten) without a summons, the judgment is made by default; (eleven) the original judgment or ruling omitted or exceeded the claim; (twelve) the legal documents on which the original judgment or ruling was based have been revoked or changed; (thirteen) the judge has corruption, bribery, favoritism, perverting the law in the trial of the case.