Fortune teller in Chenjiazhai Village, Linyi _ Who is the fortune teller in Chenjiazhai Village, Linyi?
Highlights of this article: It mainly talks about the historical evolution of the rumor that "Qianlong was said by the Han people" from Qianlong period to Jin Yong's martial arts novels, that is, fortune tellers in many literary works said that Qianlong was said by the Han people, which was "somewhat elusive" in history. There have always been four theories about who your mother is: Niu Lulu, Qian, Li and Chen.
The fortune teller may say: Your Majesty, you are a descendant of the Chinese people, so you should have a discerning eye. You can't forget your ancestors and forget that you are Han Chinese.
There is no need to take seriously the rumor that Ganlong killed the fortune teller according to the historical truth. Respondents can say nothing more than novels or film and television dramas, and even unofficial history's qualifications are not enough.
Xiao sheng xian Hou
First of all, the various systems of the Qing Dynasty were so perfect that it was basically impossible for the emperor to visit privately in incognito. Although the emperor has great power, he dare not disobey the "ancestor system".
Secondly, this kind of rumor or folk story is just a means of using superstition to publicize. Every dynasty emperor will have this kind of "luck" as a hero. It's just that the Qing Dynasty, where Qianlong lived, became famous recently. Especially the seven trips to the south of the Yangtze River, it is definitely the biggest event for southerners to see the "beauty of nature". So all kinds of people will use all kinds of psychology to arrange all kinds of stories.
Finally, I saw some respondents, and the answers were all about the stories that happened when Qianlong went down to Jiangnan. I don't know if it's the bridge in "Joking and Qianlong". But according to various legends in the past, it is nothing more than a debate about "who is the mother who continues to spend money?"
A novel is a novel, which needs no historical basis, especially a martial arts novel. Literature and art are literature and art, and history is history. People who regard literature and art as history are all only children.
When answering questions such as "Why did Zhan Zhao disappear after Bao Zheng's death, why did Zhan Zhao disappear overnight, and where did he go?" "Why did the eunuch of Kangxi Dynasty pour lime on Ma Su Lagu's head before she was buried alive?" "On the night of Kangxi's death, Yongzheng gave him Kangxi's confidant for 60 years. What was the reason?" "Bao Zheng was loyal all his life. Why did he kill Gongsun Ce with tears?"
Even a formal historical drama is not history. Its limited historical facts will also be added, deleted, changed and moved by writers according to the laws of literary and artistic creation (for example, in "Towards the Republic", Emperor Tongzhi built Yuanmingyuan, which was deceived by timber merchants and moved to Weng Tonghe 20 years later), and even made up stories for the main characters to set off the protagonist (for example, "Towards the Republic" fabricated Li Hongzhang to express that the defeat in the Sino-Japanese War was not his personal responsibility, but to fight corruption).
Therefore, literary and artistic works, no matter what historical banner or historical cloak, are not serious history and are not credible.
The premise of the letter is that you have to go through historical verification before you can believe it. Otherwise, showing off the so-called historical drama as history will only make knowledgeable people laugh.
Gan Long, as the second son alive, there is no need to "exchange civet cats for princes"
Ganlong was born in 17 1 1 year. But before it, there were Honghui (1694- 1704), Hongling (1697- 1699) and Hongling (1700- 176543). Li Hong (171-1799) was born in Hongzhou in the same year (171-1770). Gan Long is the fourth child, but the first three died before 17 1 1. Therefore, Li Hong should be the second child alive, and Hongzhou, who is three months younger than Li Hong, is the third.
Then, at that time, Yin Zhen didn't know that he wanted to be emperor, and he didn't know that Qianlong would be liked by Kangxi in a few years. These are the subsequent history, which we know that Yin Zhen didn't know at that time. So, is it necessary for him to change his son? He has no shortage of sons.
If it is the eldest son, it is entirely possible.
Although this is a literary creation, it is a fabrication. But since it is necessary to make up, it must be made up properly. If there is no hole in the wind, there must be a "hole". This "hole" is whether Gan Long's mother is Han Chinese.
In the second year of Yongzheng, Kangxi 12' s son made a slip of the pen, which caused the mystery of Ganlong's birth mother: the Eight Banners of Manchu and Han people derived from it until Ganlong appeared, which was the story flow of the Han people. The saying that Qianlong was a Han Chinese began in the late Qing Dynasty, and the first two appeared in Yongzheng and Qianlong periods.
On February 14th, the second year of Yongzheng, Yongzheng conferred the title of Nian Gengyao's sister Nian Shi as the imperial concubine, Gege Niuzhilu as the princess, Gege Song as the concubine and Gege Gengshi as the bride.
However, when Yongzheng sent a message to 12, something went wrong. On the one hand, Yunren scribbled for his own convenience, on the other hand, the "abbreviation" of Niulu is Niushi. When the Ministry of Rites made the "Golden Book" after receiving the letter, the officials admitted their mistakes, because three of the four people who were enfeoffed this time belonged to the "Eight Banners of the Han Dynasty", namely Nian Shi, Geng Shi (the mother of Hongzhou) and Song.
cloud-pattern brocade
Because of this, does not think that "sloppy cattle" is "money". As a result, a "golden book" has been achieved. I found the problem when I sent it to the cow road.
In June, Zong Renfu played Yun Jian wrongly, and asked Yongzheng to punish him: Yun Jian, the emperor of Saint Zuren, gave me a note on the instrument and the princess's gold book, and allowed him to go to the lonely mountain Beizi, demoted and made him a true official. (Yongzheng) from it. This record can be found in Records of Yongzheng.
The second is "Ugly Li", which also leads to the statement that "Gan Long was born in Yonghe Palace or chengde mountain resort", which is directly related to whether "Ugly Li" is Gan Long's mother.
From the Eight Banners to the pure Han people, it is just the spirit of some Han people: I don't think the Eight Banners are Han people anymore.
At that time, both the Eight Banners of the Han Dynasty and the concubines of the Qing Dynasty had the right of inheritance. For example, Tong Jiashi, Kangxi's mother, belonged to the Eight Banners of the Han Dynasty. The Han people in the Eight Banners are full of customs, beliefs and behaviors.
I just don't want to recognize the Han people. For example, Tong Guogang claimed that he was Manchu in the 27th year of Kangxi, and it was the Ming people who tricked their ancestors into the land of the Han people. ...
In the end, Tong Jiashi still belonged to the Eight Banners of the Han Dynasty. However, individuals and organizations that "oppose the Qing Dynasty and regain sight" do not care about this. Since you belong to the Eight Banners of the Han Dynasty, as a "Han Chinese", you can arouse the spirit of resistance. Yongzheng's political opponents will also take this as a target.
Finally, there is basically no need to refute Chen Haining's words.
Because Mr. Meng Sen has refuted this view in 1937 and Mr. Zheng Tianting in 1944. Mr. Jin Yong has long known this view. Therefore, in the "Postscript" of The Book of the Sword, it is specifically stated that Gan Long and Chen Jialuo are brothers "This is my invention".
Romance between books and swords
Therefore, as a great historian of Ming and Qing Dynasties, Mr. Meng Sen's conclusion has basically reached a consensus in the history circle, which has nothing to do with the Chen family in Haining.
To sum up, even if Gan Long's mother had an argument, it was also an argument between the Eight Banners of the Han Dynasty and Manchu, but the Eight Banners of the Han Dynasty was no longer a Han Chinese at that time. This has nothing to do with us.