Interview defense of teacher qualification certificate

In the teacher qualification interview, defense is the last link. In this link, candidates' mastery of knowledge and adaptability to the situation will be directly displayed in front of the judges and examiners, so defense is also a very important form for examiners to evaluate candidates in a short time. So how should candidates behave in the interview defense of the teacher qualification examination? The following are some basic principles in the interview defense of the teacher qualification examination, which can help candidates better master the defense link and get high marks.

First of all, stick to the theme

When replying, you must fully understand the meaning of the topic, stick to the topic, and you can't answer irrelevant questions, nor can you expand or narrow the content or scope of questions and questions at will. For example, "if you are hired by the school, how will you work?" Some candidates will start talking empty words without thinking, wasting a lot of time describing their work ambitions and goals, ignoring that the examiner asks this question more to understand the specific practices of candidates and evaluate their execution and comprehensive ability. This will make the examiner think that the candidates are mechanically plagiarized, unable to be flexible and sincere enough, and naturally they will not get high marks. Therefore, in the process of defense, candidates must stick to the topic, answer the questions asked by the topic, pay attention to the pertinence of the answers, and make innovative answers in combination with their own characteristics, so as to win the favor of examiners and get high marks.

Second, seek truth from facts.

When designing interview questions, the education department sometimes designs some questions to test the candidate's personality and principles of dealing with people, such as "please talk about your strengths and weaknesses". In order to leave a good impression on the judges, some candidates dare not admit their shortcomings frankly, and deliberately hide or even whitewash their shortcomings, just as some candidates give the answer that "my biggest shortcoming is being too honest". In this way, shattered glass gives people a false feeling, which will cause the examiner's disgust, and naturally he can't get high marks. Therefore, in the face of the examiner's questions, candidates should pay attention to seeking truth from facts, proceed from their own actual situation, do not exaggerate or narrow down, and correctly respond to the examiner's questions. When the interview involves professional knowledge, you should answer truthfully. If you can't answer the questions asked by the examiner, confess that you don't know and apologize, because one's knowledge is always limited. When you ask questions that you are familiar with, you should give full play to them.

Third, clear organization.

Logical thinking ability is an essential content in interview examination, which can be evaluated by whether the content of candidates' defense is clear or not. Concise and coherent answers show that candidates have clear thinking and strong logical thinking ability, which is one of the principles for judges to score high. Therefore, in the usual training, candidates must pay attention to training their logical thinking ability, learn to summarize complex problems and grasp their essence. Secondly, when speaking, we should pay attention to consciously training our word order, and improve the clarity of expression through some conjunctions, such as "first, second, third and fourth".