Debate on liberal arts or science.

liberal arts, by its name, means "humanities", which is different from natural science and social science. Humanities, by its characteristics, cultivates people's humanistic quality, sentiment, moral integrity and artistry. We mainly look at the world from an artistic perspective, while natural science looks at the world from practical arguments (emphasizing data analysis). For example, most people who study literature are emotional, while those who study science are rational. Judging from its practicality, the employment direction of liberal arts students is generally teachers, civil servants, research institutes and service industries. That is to say, liberal arts students are eloquent, cheerful and kind, and have strong interpersonal skills. From the point of view of economic base and superstructure, liberal arts students generally promote the development of superstructure, that is, humanism. The economic base determines the superstructure, the superstructure changes the relations of production, and the relations of production promote the development of productive forces, that is, promote social progress. Therefore, the two are inseparable. The industries that science students are engaged in are generally related to the economic base. Please learn more about the dialectical relationship between production relations, productivity, economic base and superstructure.

By the way, I'm also a liberal arts student. In the debate, maybe the other party will say that the liberal arts have no technical content or deny the usefulness of the liberal arts. For this, I want to make it clear that the study of liberal arts in high school is basically an understanding memory, so it's good to say it in your own words when you understand it.