Is there really match-fixing in this World Cup?
In the history of the World Cup, fans have called it "match-fixing" many times. Undeniably, some of them shouted out because the fans couldn't accept the result, but some games were really suspicious, but the outside world has been unable to produce evidence to prove whether it was a fake match or a tacit understanding.
Canadian journalists publish books.
Expose the shady world cup match-fixing in Germany.
2008 was not the World Cup year, but a piece of news about the World Cup that year caused an uproar.
There was match-fixing in the 2006 World Cup. On September 1 day, 2008, Canadian journalist Hill disclosed in his book "A Definite Victory" that the result of the 2006 Brazil 1/8 World Cup against Ghana was suspected of being manipulated. Hill claimed that before the World Cup in Germany, he attended an "agreement ball" meeting arranged by gamblers in Bangkok, in which former Ghanaian national Danba participated. At the meeting, he learned that Ghanaian players were very dissatisfied with the Football Association because of the bonus issue. The Football Association finally promised that the player's individual winning bonus for each game was $20,000, and the gambling group offered $30,000 for each Ghanaian player. Hill also claimed that Britain/KOOC-0/-0 defeated Ecuador/KOOC-0//8 in the final, Italy defeated Ukraine/KOOC-0//4 in the final 3-0, and Italy defeated Ghana 2-0, all of which were suspected of fraud.
The topic of world cup match-fixing has been debated among fans for a long time, so Hill's exposure as a reporter immediately attracted widespread attention. In the World Cup in Germany, Ghana played an incredible match against the powerful defending champion Brazil. Brazil scored three goals in a row. It is worth mentioning that all three goals were achieved by offside. In the game, Ghana player Ji' an was suspected of diving in the 8 th1minute and got the second yellow card ... Is there really any inside story? At that time, the change of handicap seemed to fulfill Hill's insistence on match-fixing. Unfortunately, Hill did not publish some evidence on his personal website as he said, so the possibility of Hill's self-promotion also exists. At first, FIFA also indicated that it would investigate the matter, but it ended in nothing.
198 1 World Cup qualifiers
Is China Men's Football Team a Victim?
Speaking of "match-fixing" in the World Cup, we can't help but mention Saudi Arabia's "stabbing" against China. 198 12 world cup qualifiers, the head coach of China team is Su Yongshun, and there are many technical players such as Rong Zhixing and Gu Guangming. China played home and away matches with Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and New Zealand, with the top two qualifying. China got off to a bad start, losing to New Zealand 0-0 in the first two rounds. In the difficult situation, China's generate rebounded strongly: 3-0 defeated Kuwait, 4-2 and 2-0 defeated Saudi Arabia, and China, who had won three games in a row, quickly seized the favorable position for qualifying. 0-/kloc-0-After losing to Kuwait, China took the lead in ending all the games and dissolving the team. As long as New Zealand can't beat Saudi Arabia by more than five goals in the final round, China football can qualify. However, Saudi Arabia "just" lost to New Zealand by five goals, which made China and New Zealand both tied in points and goal difference, ranking second after Kuwait. The two teams played an overtime game in Singapore, and the winner marched into Spain. After the dissolution, the unprepared China team rushed into battle, and 1-2 lost the qualification to participate in the World Cup, which delayed the national football team from entering the World Cup stage for 20 years.
Domestic fans have always insisted that Saudi Arabia's 0-5 loss to New Zealand was a disappointment. However, some fans pointed out that if people really want to release water, wouldn't they just lose 0-6 or more? If China wins 5-0, won't Saudi Arabia please both sides? China must blame them for discharging water, and New Zealand even blames them for not discharging water cleanly. In fact, China's fate is in its own hands. As long as it beats New Zealand in the play-offs, it will qualify. However, what is even more ridiculous is that it disbanded itself before the whole game was completely over. Isn't this more ridiculous than doubting others? Asserting that others are releasing water, are you also shirking responsibility for yourself?
Lottery tickets have been accused of being tricky many times.
Is the World Cup a scam?
When talking about whether there is match-fixing in the World Cup, many netizens' views are, "Yes, but in most cases, teams will consider their opponents when they enter the knockout stage. If there is a huge shady scene, at least I don't believe it. " In contrast, there is a shocking view-"The World Cup itself is a scam." Previously, the World Cup lottery was repeatedly accused of being tricky. People who hold this view believe that the World Cup anti-counterfeiting has already started from the moment of drawing lots.
Four years ago in Leipzig, Germany, Pele, Argentina's sworn enemy, personally pulled Argentina into the "death group" of the Netherlands, Cô te d 'Ivoire and Serbia and Montenegro, and matthaeus, Italy's sworn enemy, personally pulled Italy into the "death group" of the Czech Republic, Ghana and the United States. Italian media even gave their evidence after the draw: matthaeus picked up a ball and put it back, and then took another ball. Matthaeus only knows which team was drawn. So how is the lottery manipulated? Some netizens summed up some cheating methods: for example, let each ball have a different temperature. The method is to put the meatballs in the refrigerator and oven respectively. In addition, you can also use high-tech means to place a heating device in the ball. In addition, the balls used in the lucky draw are different in size, which will not reveal clues from a distance, but it is easy for guests who observe closely to distinguish them. Why should the World Cup draw be tricky? For money, of course. If the groups are as the fans wish, the attention of the World Cup will be further enhanced, and money will naturally roll in. However, this statement is also lack of evidence to support, but the absence of evidence does not mean that there is really no trick. "Doping has been detected, but high technology has not been detected", a classic famous saying, can be extended to "playing is tricky, playing is fair", which is probably the best summary of lottery cheating.
Conspiracy is everywhere or conspiracy theories are everywhere.
For those strange games, the parties can actually get rid of the relationship in one sentence, "anything can happen on the football field."
And judging whether there is match-fixing in the World Cup, fans can also draw conclusions from a dialectical point of view. "There can't be absolute things in the world, so there must be fake balls!"
If you believe the former, the subtext in your heart is: World Cup conspiracy theories are everywhere; If you believe the latter, the subtext in your heart is: World Cup conspiracies are everywhere.
I used to believe that conspiracy theories were everywhere, but the anti-gambling storm in China football changed my opinion. Is the crow really black? The World Cup, which represents the highest level of world football, and China football are tarred with the same brush?
I hope Hill's book "Winning" is nothing more than fantasy novel, which he has been idle and bored to finish, otherwise one day the truth will really surface, and it will be a sad day.