In Princess Pearl, why is the life story of the swallow exposed in the painting?

Hello, I'm Jin Jiuyin 10, and I'm glad to answer this question for you. Princess Pearl is a costume comedy adapted from Qiong Yao's novel of the same name. It is directed by Sun Shupei, written by Qiong Yao himself and co-starred by Zhao Wei, Ruby Lin, Alec Su, Zhou Jie, Julian Chen, Zhang Tie-Lin and Fan Bingbing. The play tells the story of Wei Zi, the daughter of Qianlong, who went to Beijing to meet her long-lost father. In desperation, I met the female snitch, Swallow, and became sisters.

Swallow tried to sneak into the palace for her, but mistakenly exchanged identities with Wei Zi and became a member of the Qing Palace? Princess Pearl? And deeply loved by Qianlong. In the TV series Princess Zhu Huan, Zhihua exposed the story of the swallow in front of the emperor, undoubtedly hoping that the emperor would get rid of the swallow so that the swallow and Yongqi could not be together, but no one expected that the emperor would forgive the swallow and let Yongqi and the swallow leave in the end.

Knowing the painting may never be understood. The swallow is always the emperor's favorite child. The biggest mistake of knowing painting is not to expose the life experience of the swallow, but to overestimate his position in the emperor's heart and underestimate the position of the swallow in the emperor's heart. Knowing the painting doesn't understand, the emperor's accusation against the swallow is not really annoying, but a kind of hatred between the father and the son, and it is also the emperor who gave the position of Yongqi Difujin to knowing the painting.

However, the emperor's preference for swallows has always been obvious. The painter who became Defoe Jin forgot to be cautious and that the swallow could be so unscrupulous in the palace, not only because of Yong Qi, but also because of the emperor's love for her. The story of the film has a clever starting point, a clear main line and repeated suspense. The characters are distinctive, the deductive techniques are exaggerated and vivid, and the actors' acting skills are generally young and immature, but they are surprising, and they deeply feel the brilliance and charm of the actors themselves. Ok, that's the end of today's answer. I don't know if this answer will help you, but you are welcome to leave a message with me to discuss it.