China Naming Network - Solar terms knowledge - The ghosts in Tomb Robbers Notes are too weak to blow out lamps. Why don’t they destroy Qin Shihuang’s Mausoleum and Qianling Mausoleum?

The ghosts in Tomb Robbers Notes are too weak to blow out lamps. Why don’t they destroy Qin Shihuang’s Mausoleum and Qianling Mausoleum?

The Tomb Robbers Notes are so weak that ghosts blowing out lamps are so weak. Why don’t you go and destroy Qin Shihuang’s Mausoleum and Qianling Mausoleum

Qin Shihuang’s tomb has been excavated, and the Qianling Mausoleum has also been excavated, not to mention you. The tombs we know were definitely excavated by archaeologists. How can others turn them upside down? It’s embarrassing to say that if you don’t have some brains, you will really be deceived. What does Tomb Robbery’s Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang mean?

Is there a Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang? I remember that there is no such a grave robbing point in the main text. It must not be in the main text, right? In the tomb robbing notes, Wu Xie and the others visited these places: Tomb of King Lu, Qinling Mountains, Undersea Tomb, Yunding Tiangong, Xiwangmu City, Zhang Family Ancient Building, etc. In addition to mentioning that Uncle Wu was particularly interested in Qin Shihuang In addition, there is no specific mention of the Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang. What is the name of the part about the Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang in Ghost Blowing a Lantern?

I have compiled a complete collection of Ghost Blowing a Lantern before. You can download it and take a look. This part is included in it. Let me share a network disk link with you.

If you can’t download it on your mobile phone, download it on your computer.

Take the trouble to organize it and adopt it in time.

Why haven’t tomb robbers robbed Qin Shihuang’s Mausoleum for thousands of years

Qin Shihuang’s Huangling Tomb is the largest mausoleum in the world. After more than 30 years of continuous construction, its scale is so grand. It is rare in history.

The mausoleum has been admired by tomb robbers throughout the ages. Many robber holes have been found around the mausoleum. Current detection has also found a lot of ashes. It is speculated that it was the work of tomb robbers, but thankfully Yes, no tomb robbers have ever entered the underground palace of Huangling. Why is this? Scientific detection shows that the mercury content near the underground palace is 400 times that of its surroundings. Mercury is also highly volatile at room temperature. It is possible that the tomb robbers were poisoned by its steam as soon as they arrived nearby. Another reason is that its underground palace is deep, and its depth exceeds the depth of the three layers of groundwater. Third, the top and surrounding areas of the underground palace are covered with thick limestone, which is why it has not been stolen or collapsed in more than 2,000 years. Lao Liang: Why did the tomb robbers dare not touch the Mausoleum of the First Emperor of Qin?

First of all, the Mausoleum of the First Emperor of Qin is deep enough. Historical records record that the First Emperor of Qin used mercury to make rivers, lakes and seas, and even placed his coffins floating on the East China Sea made of mercury. At present, It is confirmed that there is mercury in the Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor, and it is large-scale. If it is opened now, there is no technology to prevent mercury gas from volatilizing and killing surrounding residents.

Therefore, there is mercury vapor in the mausoleum, and tomb robbers would not want to die. Notes or ghost blowing lights, that one is about robbing the tomb of Qin Shihuang. I have seen the sixth tomb robbing notebook, and I have never robbed Qin Shihuang.

These two books are not about robbing Qin Shihuang. The first part of "Ghost Blowing the Lamp" mainly robbed the tomb of King Xian of Yunnan, the tomb of the Queen in the ancient city of Xinjiang, and another unfinished tomb in Shaanxi. There is a tomb in Kunlun Mountain, so there is no tomb of Qin Shihuang. Notes on tomb robbing (I personally think the first 4 parts were very exciting before they were revised). The first part was the tomb in Shandong, and then the tomb under the sea. These parts are all relatively exciting. , there is no robbery of the tomb of the First Qin Emperor, please explain the mystery of the First Qin Emperor's Mausoleum and tomb robbery

Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor (Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor), that is, Ying Zheng, the first emperor of the Qin Dynasty (259 BC-210 BC) The cemetery is referred to as Qin Shihuang Mausoleum or Qin Mausoleum. It is located at the northern foot of Lishan Mountain, 5 kilometers east of Lintong District, Xi'an City, Shaanxi Province, China.

Qin Shihuang’s Mausoleum is the first emperor’s cemetery in Chinese history. Its huge scale and rich burial objects rank first among the emperor’s mausoleums in the past dynasties. The Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang was built over a period of 39 years from 246 BC to 208 BC. It is the first large-scale and well-designed imperial cemetery in Chinese history. The Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang has two rammed earth walls inside and outside, symbolizing the imperial city and palace city of the capital. The mausoleum is located in the south of the inner city. It is in the shape of an overturned bucket. It is 51 meters high and has a base circumference of more than 1,700 meters. According to historical records, various palaces were built in the Qin Mausoleum, displaying many strange treasures. There are a large number of burial pits and tombs with different shapes and connotations scattered around the Qin Mausoleum. More than 400 of them have been discovered.

The Mausoleum of the First Emperor of Qin is the largest, most unique, and richest imperial mausoleum in the world. The Terracotta Warriors and Horses of Qin Shihuang are a precious treasure of human culture in the world, comparable to the Egyptian pyramids and ancient Greek sculptures. They fully demonstrate the ingenious artistic talents of the working people of the Han people in ancient China more than 2,000 years ago. They are the pride and precious wealth of the Chinese nation.

Excavation work began in 1980, and it has been listed as a national key cultural relic protection unit and a world cultural heritage.

It was learned from the Qin Shihuang Emperor’s Mausoleum Museum that trial excavation of the burial pit numbered K9801 is under way. Various signs indicate that the burial pit is likely to be a large "arms depot" in the Mausoleum of Emperor Qin Shihuang. The mystery of why Qin Shi Huang’s tomb was not excavated

The technical conditions of the archaeological cultural relics are not up to par, and they are afraid of repeating the tragedy of the on-site destruction of cultural relics during the excavation of the Ming Dingling Tomb

Public opinion is generally opposed, and looking at the world There is no precedent for actively excavating imperial tombs (unless stolen)

Policy does not allow it. Premier Zhou set an iron rule not to excavate imperial tombs for 100 years

The heavy archaeological work Nowadays, there are frequent construction projects in various places and there is a shortage of archaeologists. Instead of digging up royal tombs, it is better to solve the archaeological projects that need to be rescued first. For example, drilling is required along the highway, and it is necessary to explore whether there are ancient tombs near high-rise buildings

I hope Luzhu can adopt it. 3Q

In addition, Qin Shihuang’s Mausoleum contains abnormally high mercury content, which is extremely harmful to the human body. Moreover, Sima Qian described that the underground palace was equipped with hidden weapons to prevent theft, and rash excavation without preparation may lead to casualties. Why not dig Qin Shihuang’s Mausoleum?

Under the current circumstances, there is no excuse for excavation of the tomb of Qin Shihuang. Taking the excavation of imperial tombs as the starting point and using cultural relics to drive tourism and promote local economic development is an illusion. In addition to the lack of technology, social mentality issues must also be considered. At present, domestic archaeological technology is not yet mature. Who can guarantee that the unearthed cultural relics will be foolproof? If we contemporary people do not follow objective laws and only use temporary impulse and desire to excavate the tomb of the First Emperor, then future generations will not praise us for our intelligence and wisdom, but may blame us for our eagerness for quick success and instant benefits, which leads to endless troubles. Stupid move. As for when the Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang will be excavated, from the current point of view, it is in the distant future. Some say it will be impossible to excavate within 50 years, and some say it will be impossible to excavate within 100 years. There are several reasons: First, the need to implement cultural relics protection policies. The current cultural relics protection policy is "protection first, rescue first, rational utilization, and strengthening management". Generally speaking, imperial tombs are not actively excavated. This heritage protection policy is based on lessons learned at home and abroad. Today, cultural relics and archaeological institutions in various countries around the world have formulated policies to maintain the original environment of cultural relics as much as possible for large-scale sites and tombs that are well preserved, and generally do not conduct active excavations. Second, there are special requirements for world heritage protection. Excavation of the Qin Mausoleum is labor-intensive, time-consuming and costly, and should not be considered unless it is absolutely necessary. In addition, the Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang has become a member of the World Heritage List, so we must be even more cautious. For cultural relics buried underground for more than two thousand years, oxidation and decay only occurred in the first few years after burial. Later, trace amounts of oxidation occurred, and now they are quite hidden. If opened rashly, the cultural relics will be affected by humidity, temperature, wind, light and external vibrations, and will change immediately. Third, it is indeed difficult to excavate the Qin Mausoleum. Excavation of the Qin Mausoleum must be carried out by "revealing the top". The sealing soil must be removed before the excavation can be excavated. This raises a series of questions: After the sealing is removed, the underground palace covers an area of ​​more than 200,000 square meters, and it cannot be fully excavated in a short period of time. How to ensure that the ruins and cultural relics of the underground palace are not damaged by wind, rain, sunlight and other natural factors during excavation? After removing the sealing soil and excavating it, how can the sealing soil be covered again to maintain the original appearance? How to protect the excavated cultural relics? Wait, these are practical questions. Fourthly, from the perspective of the nation’s moral orientation of respecting ancestors, it is not allowed to excavate ancestral graves at will. In the old society, the practice of digging up graves and whipping corpses was a way of venting hatred. Qin Shihuang was a tyrant, but he was an ancestor after all. It should be said that Qin Shihuang's merits outweighed his faults, and "faults" were also derived from "merits".

People have a kind of curiosity and want to dig into it to see what is going on. This is understandable, but it must be considered from the moral perspective of respecting ancestors. Why is the Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang not being excavated?

On the one hand, some technologies are not yet mature in China and cannot meet the requirements for mining and good preservation. Japan has proposed to excavate the Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang with China, as long as the treasures are obtained. One in ten, but was directly rejected by the Chinese Communist Party.

On the other hand, the Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang should not be opened, no matter from the perspective of national psychology, national sentiment, respect for ancestors or even from the perspective of idealistic dragon vein feng shui. A Japanese reporter asked a Chinese archaeologist: "When will China open the Mausoleum of Qin Shihuang? The whole world wants to see what is buried inside." The Chinese archaeologist immediately asked the Japanese reporter: "What do you plan to do in Japan?" When will the tombs of the Japanese emperors be opened?" The reporter replied: "We have never planned to open the tombs of the emperors, and we do not want to disturb them." The Chinese scholar immediately said to him angrily: "You do not want to disturb your emperor. , then why do we Chinese open the tomb of our emperor to disturb them? "

There is another reason, that is, Dingling is the first in the history of Japan and China. It is also the only imperial tomb that has been excavated in a planned, organized and proactive manner authorized by the State Council. However, after the underground palace was opened, countless rare treasures dimmed into ashes the moment they came into contact with the air. Three huge red lacquered coffins made of golden nanmu were abandoned and destroyed. The corpses of Emperor Wanli and his two queens arrived one after another. They were regarded as "feudal remnants" and burned to the ground during the Cultural Revolution. Archaeologists learned from the pain and wrote to Zhou Enlai, and finally set the "iron rule" that "the imperial tombs will not be moved within a hundred years."