Doubt heavy door
1. What is the temporal and spatial relationship between Chongmen City and Qigong?
There are a lot of historical materials to explain the name of Chongmen. Chongmen City is Qi Palace, or Qi Palace is Chongmen City. Is history really like this? There may be some truth in the law of the ancient city system, but we can confidently speculate that Chongmen City is not only Miyagi (Qi Palace), but also an outer city. At least there are some houses of a certain scale outside Miyagi. Otherwise, Schleswig-Holstein supported Liu Xie Kouluo, leaving the trench above the heavy gate, and also "led a ride of 20 thousand to Dayang (now southwest of Pinglu County, Shanxi Province)." This army of more than 20,000 riders can't be only a few dozen. According to the marching speed and the scale of chariots in ancient times, tens of thousands of troops should have at least hundreds of vehicles, and some people should stay behind to feed the horses. In addition, grain and grass reserves and vigilance for self-defense are not enough for a small-scale Qi palace. Based on this, it is speculated that Chongmen City is by no means equal to Qi Palace, but should be an important town with considerable architectural scale in ancient western China during Cao Wei period. Because a large number of copper coins unearthed here, broken bricks and tiles everywhere, pottery fragments, and buried wooden columns and pillars can all prove the glory and glory of this ancient city: streets and lanes are criss-crossed, shops are mixed; Businessmen are very busy; There are rows of tea shops in the hall. Otherwise, Liu Yao and Schleswig-Holstein will never form an alliance, from which we can completely conclude that Qi Palace should be Miyagi in Zhongmen City, or there must be a considerable number of houses outside Qi Palace. This undoubtedly involves the scale, layout and economic and social status of Chongmen City in Cao Wei period. A Study on the Historical Status of the Ancient Capital of China and Xiangzhou: "A series of mountain prospects at the eastern foot of Taihang Mountain from south to north provide an ideal passage for people to travel from south to north, so this road has occupied an extremely important position since ancient times", which also provides indirect basis and information for us to guess that Chongmen is an important town on this ancient equator (also known as the imperial road from Luoyang to Yeh in Kyoto).
2. Is the square palace the old palace before the abolition of the palace or the new palace after the abolition of the palace?
There are different records on this issue in various historical books. The reflection of the Three Kingdoms Wei Zhi Wang Qi Ji Fang said: "It was the day when I moved away from the palace. On 23rd, 2008, I made people offer sacrifices to the Imperial Guard and set up the palace in Hanoi (it), which was like a gift from a vassal state." "Zi Tongzhi Wei Jianji Eight Little Li Linggong Xia" said: "On that day, the emperor was located in the front hall of Taiji, and everyone who was dazzled was happy. He was pardoned and changed to the Yuan Dynasty, which was the Qijian Palace in Hanoi." The above two statements, whether "camp" or "building", are basically the same, and both refer to the newly built "Qi Palace" after being abandoned. However, the article "A Record of the King of Qi in China (ICY)" says: "In September 254 (the first year of Zhengshi), ICY was deposed, reduced to the King of Qi, and moved to his former residence ..." This is quite different from the above two statements! This at least shows that there was a Qi Palace before the King (Fang) of Qi was abolished. This coincides with the field investigation by Zhang Xinbin, director of the Institute of Archaeology of the Provincial Academy of Social Sciences. "Chongmen City has a long history, at least before the Han Dynasty!" These statements complement each other. What is false remains to be further verified by Fang Jia.
There are also historical records that the location of "Chongmen City" in Dashi Village is different. For example, the Dictionary of Place Names in Xinxiang City, Henan Province said: "Chongmen Store is located in the northwest corner of Dashi Village on the east side of Huangshui River." "huixian city Zhi" also said: "Chongmen Store is located in the southeast of Shi Cun, northwest of the city 10 km." Daoguang's "Hui County Records" said: "Fangcheng, suspected and Zhongmen City, is located in Xishi Village, 20 miles west of the county, with a width of 220 steps." These three different opinions are that writers in different times misjudged each other, or that writers in different periods found obvious relics in different directions. If it is the latter, we have to consider the historical fact that Chongmen City has an outer city (because when I investigated Dashi Village, it was reported that some villagers dug sand in the southeast of the village and found wooden beams and columns). Of course, the possibility that Chongmen City was flooded by Huang Shuihe cannot be ruled out.
3. Textual research on the theory that Fangcheng is suspicious and the door is heavy for the city.
There are many historical books explaining the name of Chongmen City, and there are also many historical records about place names. I have already talked a lot about the explanation of the name of Chongmen, so I won't go into details.
However, except for a few books about Huixian local chronicles, there are special entries in the explanation of Fangcheng, while the most authoritative dictionary of ancient and modern place names in China and Historical Geography in China have no records about Fangcheng. Therefore, arbitrarily saying that Chongmen City is also called Fangcheng seems to be unable to convince the public. Recently, I visited Chongmen many times with relevant personnel, which made the author gradually realize why Huixian local chronicles are simply annotated as Fangcheng under the heading of Fangcheng. Originally, according to the building scale and specifications, ancient cities were commonly known as "Nine Six Cities" (nine miles wide from east to west and six miles long from north to south, such as the ancient city of Luoyang) and "Seven Five Cities" (seven miles wide from east to west and five miles long from north to south, such as Yecheng). Naturally, the walls around them are roughly equal, which is called Fangcheng (such as the ancient city of Taiyuan). According to the relevant personnel of huixian city Cultural Bureau Museum and the branch secretary of Dashi Village, after measurement, the walls around Chongmen City are roughly the same, and this mystery is solved. No wonder the "Fangcheng" object is simply described as "suspected to be a heavy door city", so that's it!
4. Guess the tomb is in the northeast corner of Qigong.
On a hill in the northeast corner of the ruins of Qi Palace, there is a large-scale ancient tomb. According to some elders in Shi Cun, in the 1970s, there were stone sheep and horses lined up on both sides of Shinto, which had a royal momentum. But for thousands of years, no one knows who the tomb owner is. What's more, I don't know why the prince's children chose this land of feng shui for their ancestors.
Recently, at the invitation of Mr. Guiheng Li, I visited Chongmen many times, and many doubts flashed through my mind from time to time, especially whether this ancient tomb was the place where Cao Fang was imprisoned and died at Chongmen, but it still lingered in my mind. Because according to historical records, in the Cao Wei regime, except for Cao Cao who died in Emperor Wu, most of the graves of the other five emperors, namely, Emperor Cao Pi, Cao Ruiyou, Qi Guofang, Gui Gui Xiang Gong Cao Mao and Cao Huan, are clearly recorded. Among them, Wendi was buried in Shouyang Mausoleum (south of Mianchi Shouyang Mountain), Ming Di was buried in Gaopingling (Dashi Mountain in the southeast of Luoyang, Henan Province), and returned home to be buried in Luoyang. Only Cao Fang and Yuan Di Cao Huan's burial place is unknown. Cao Fang, in particular, "A Record of the Ancient Emperors of China" only said: "On behalf of Wei, Cao Fang was reduced to Shao. The aftermath is unknown. " Is this the negligence of historians, or is Cao Fang a county magistrate with a low political status who is not worthy of historians' account or history? I think it's probably the second case, especially when Cao Fang died in the tenth year of Taishigong (274) and Sima Jian just finished ten spring and autumn periods in the Jin Dynasty. On the one hand, Sima Group's political line of eliminating dissidents is still going on, and the fate of the "Seven Sages of Bamboo Forest", including the famous Taizai Zhong Fanfen who deposed Cao Fang because of dissatisfaction with Sima, is still "speechless". Sleep in the car, not on the ground. ..... After thirty years, eighty-four years, I finally slept in "(see History as a Mirror, Volume 11), which shows that after Cao Fang's resentful death, no one dared to publicly advocate that Cao Fang should be buried according to the ceremony of Cao Wei. On the other hand, in the fifth year of Taishi (269) before Cao Fang's death, the rebellion of Qiang and Hu began, and the contradictions between Xianbei, Xiongnu, Tong, Bianyi and Qiang and the decadent Han regime in the Western Jin Dynasty intensified one after another. The ruling clique in the Western Jin Dynasty should not only be busy appeasing the remote areas and preventing these ethnic minorities from disrupting the Central Plains, but also actively participate in factional struggles, strive for the dominance of the platform, and brew civil strife in the palace. Therefore, it is also possible that the servants hastily chose a place for burial near the heavy door. Based on the above, the author thinks that this ancient tomb is probably the burial place of Cao Fang, so please pay special attention when studying the Chongmen culture!