Reflections on why Kazuo Inamori’s management requires philosophy after reading Zhihu
Keys to writing reflections after reading
After we read a work or an article, we will naturally be moved and have many thoughts, but many of these thoughts are fragmented and some are vague. They are lost in a flash. To write down your thoughts after reading, you must be good at catching these fragmented or even vague thoughts, think about them over and over again, compare them over and over again, find two more prominent ones that are targeted to reality, and then concentrate on them. Think about it and sort it out on the basis of deep thought. Only in this way can you grasp the problems of practical significance and write down real, profound and valuable thoughts that can be used to solve people's problems in learning, thinking and practice. Come.
Fourth, be authentic and natural. That is to say, write your true feelings. Write how you are moved and think. The more specific and real your thoughts are, the more realistic they will be. The article will be sincere, lively, and inspiring.
From the perspective of expression techniques, the post-reading comments are usually mixed with narratives and discussions, and when necessary, lyrical methods are used. Narration is to combine facts with reality. Discussion It is to talk about feelings and reason. Lyricity is to express the passion after reading. The narrative language should be summarized and concise, the discussion should be accurate, and the lyricism should be concentrated. The three should be integrated, and empty words, big words, and slogans should be avoided.
From the perspective of expression, there are two types: one is to explain the truth in connection with reality. This is to use one's own personal experience and concrete and vivid examples to clarify the correctness of a truth from the combination of theory and practice, and to make the theory concrete To make it flesh and blood, make things reasonable, make things clear, and lively. The other is to elucidate the meaning from the perspective of research theory. Based on your own research and understanding, clarify a difficult to understand ideological point of view, or Evaluate the ideological significance of a work. Its function is to theoretically help readers deepen their understanding of the original text. The focus of this kind of post-reading feeling is still on the word "feeling", but it is more theoretical, so we must pay attention to the discussion. The article has clear arguments, typical arguments, and a clear and prominent center.