Gansu Marathon 100 km cross-country race 2 1 people were killed. Who will bear the responsibility?
In a marathon, 265,438+0 people died because of the temperature loss of the participants in extreme weather. Anyone who heard the news expressed regret and sadness. 2 1 lives were unexpectedly lost, and it is hard to imagine how much the families of 2 1 victims were also hit. So when it comes to the division of responsibility for this accident, many people have begun to hold their own views.
First, it is obviously unreasonable to blame only the players themselves.
At the beginning of the accident, some netizens who didn't know much about the whole competition organization thought that extreme sports were risky, so the contestants volunteered to participate in the competition and prepared their own equipment. If they encounter such a natural disaster, there is nothing they can do. Of course, no one is right or wrong, and the deceased himself has certain responsibilities, but the deceased has gone, and this matter should be forgotten.
Can this really go away? The answer is of course not. No matter the natural disasters at any time and any place, it has never been said that only the deceased himself is responsible, and there is no follow-up and no specific responsibility can be investigated. The simplest example, prevention and control at the beginning of the epidemic last year, was also a natural disaster. Why was a market supervision official in Wuhan suspended? The reason is that the supervision is not in place, it is outrageous and unreasonable, and there is no fear for the dead.
The same marathon is not a solo fight, nor is it an unorganized and unmanaged play. It is not clear whether the participants have some factors that force them to participate. Since there are organizers or regulators, it is inevitable that they will participate. Whether the responsibility is light or heavy, at least it depends on their attitude. The results must also be described according to whether supervision and implementation are in place. Don't say 265,438+0 lives, even if it is half-life, it will definitely be clear, and no one can be less.
Second, the idea of blaming natural disasters is an attempt to evade responsibility.
Although natural disasters occur naturally, they can be divided into irresistible factors and irresistible factors, and the accidents caused by this sudden change of climate are also preventable factors, so we should make full preparations, knowing that this is a kind of high-intensity exercise. Gansu Marathon is a famous organized large-scale competition. It is the responsibility of all concerned to prevent all possible dangers. Failure to strengthen prevention is tantamount to resignation, disrespect for human life and blasphemy against life.
A few days after the accident, the organizer deliberately tried to shirk part of the responsibility and left it to the meteorological department. Seeing this situation obviously makes people feel too irresponsible and unrealistic, so they try to find someone to share it. Does the responsibility need to be shared by other departments? Shouldn't this be a matter of law enforcement and trial? If you find someone to share it with yourself, people will be accused. Won't this make people see it as an escape?
Third, the organizer is mainly responsible for the omission of security.
172 people in a game, 2 1 people died and 8 people were injured, which is equivalent to one sixth of the casualty rate, which is probably more serious than a blockade war. Faced with such an unavoidable major responsibility, the relevant departments tried to take money to seal it. When interviewing the families of the victims, the reporter mentioned: Some people want to take 950,000 "compensation" to quell the dissatisfaction caused by this incident. For such a long time, there has been no investigation result, and who should be held accountable has been dragging on.
The event is so huge that the eyes of the whole country are staring at it, and the responsibility of the organizers cannot escape. Even if the family members agree to collect money to calm down, the people will never allow irresponsible excuses and can get away with it. How much responsibility does the organizer bear, whether it exceeds this 950 thousand, and whether it will leave future troubles if it is not brought to justice and punished? This is a problem that everyone cares about. According to the recent survey, the organizer has not set up supply points and first aid facilities on the track of this event. This alone shows that this responsibility is also quite big.
In addition, who is the individual in charge of safety supervision and management in the contractor, and his dereliction of duty is also the main trigger, or this unit has no such management personnel at all. According to common sense, a sports competition, not to mention such a large-scale marathon and high-intensity cross-country race, can not be without any emergency rescue measures in this regard, let alone as simple as firing a gun at the start and pulling a rope at the end.
Conclusion: In any case, if the units and personnel involved are not found out and made public, will they continue to do their previous work without fear? This is irresponsible to more people. Generally speaking, how to maintain the order of our whole society, how to protect people's lives, and what are the laws of nature?