The ancestral graves are in other people's fields. What should they do now? Do you understand?

The ancestral graves are in other people's fields. This sentence is not used correctly At present, the ownership of cultivated land belongs to the village collective. What he is planting now is only a continuation of the contract responsibility system of joint production, and he has some responsibilities and rights. But strictly speaking, the ownership of this land does not belong to him, but to the village collective. According to the second-round contract of cultivated land, that is, from the second-round contract, it will remain unchanged for 3 years, and whoever planted it will still be cultivated for 3 years.

In this case, your ancestral grave is in his contracted responsibility field, which should be the grave first and he contracted it later. However, the general rule is that when the village committee contracts out the cultivated land, it should subtract the grave area, and the contractor will not suffer. However, if a new tomb head is added to the grave after he contracted the cultivated land, the descendants of the ancestral grave should be responsible for making up each other's taste according to the local market price. This is relatively reasonable, and in many places, it is mostly solved by this kind of civil consultation.

If the other party refuses to pay the money, refuses to negotiate and insists on moving to the grave, it shows that the two families are in conflict for other reasons, and the other party is playing dirty. In this case, you should calm down and think about what you have done to the other party. Then, find out the reason and try to solve it through consultation. I believe that as long as the attitude is sincere, modest and friendly, it will definitely be solved. In your case, a tree caused a contradiction. It's easy to handle. Trees have tree prices, so it's not good to double them to him according to the market price, so it's not good to cut him another tree. Besides, the other party should understand that burial on the grave is crowded and chaotic. The key is that you should have a good attitude. Made up, everything is easy.

The ancestral graves are in other people's homes. Since they are ancestral graves, it is proved that they are very old, but before they were divided, the whole world was a national territory, and no one has the right to call them away except for the state expropriation. My husband's family is a landlord unless money is given to negotiate relocation. After liberation, the land reform has distributed the land to people. However, we have the right to manage the ancestral graves every year. I directly allocated the family that was once divided to plant trees on my ancestral graves. The right to use them belongs to him, but it cannot infringe on the ancestral graves. Because the ancestral graves were first distributed to him, the ancestral graves are protected by law and no one can hurt them. If it is after the land is settled, without the consent of the contractor, the negotiation is not good, and the buried one cannot be moved. The deceased is the biggest. What were you doing at the beginning? If those who are not hidden are repaired, they have the right not to be buried. One of my relatives just built it on someone else's site, and now it's asking exorbitant prices, so we gave it up and rebuilt it on our own land these days.