Video interpretation of where dad goes to draw lots.

Until adulthood, it was called the adult version of Where's Dad Going? The form and production of the program are basically the original crew of "Where is Dad?". Compared with Where is Dad Going, the guest lineup of All the way to adulthood is more attractive, but the score is not as good as that of Where is Dad Going, and the score is still declining. Why? Is it the fault of the star or the pot of the script?

1, there is a problem with the program link connection.

Maruko and his father want to play in the water, but no one around invites them. Maruko refused to invite them again, and all the children went again. This link makes people feel a little puzzling. Why didn't you go the first time and the second time?

Although it is known from the preparation behind that it is the arrangement of the program group, the connection between the two invitations makes people feel a bit abrupt. Everyone is still rehearsing, and it is a bit strange that several children and adults suddenly get together separately. The program gives people a very incoherent feeling.

2. Poor voting participation.

After five groups of families performed their masterpieces respectively, other families drew lots to imitate them. After the imitation, five groups of families uploaded the video of the program performance to the internet, and the netizens selected the two groups with the highest popularity to stay in star-rated hotels.

First of all, this kind of performance competition is not about popularity, but about acting skills, which is unfair to the guests on the spot. They participated in the performance of the program, but they have no right to say the result. It is clear that five people compete to choose a house, and the result can only be like a chopping board. What's the point of them trying to rehearse?

For the audience in front of the TV, it is even more puzzling. I didn't see everyone's performance, but I was as suspense as the audience of "I am a singer" and listened to the results. Since we are talking about popularity, what programs are the audience watching? Search online and it came out. Why wait for Li Rui's intentional suspense like a guest?

It is unpleasant to create conflict.

From the very beginning, the program group created a little sheep for Xu Jinjiang, showing the sharp contrast between him in film and television works and him in real life. Although this is the reality, it does not rule out the deliberate editing of the program group. The program group not only aimed at Xu Jinjiang all the time, but also arranged the whole drama conflict of the program in Xu Jinjiang.

Arrange a few old stars in uninhabited places and let them live in houses that they can't live in at all. These guests are all adults. Do they still need to endure hardships and experience life? Xu Jinjiang, in particular, can't stand the harsh living environment. As a result, the program group arranged for him to live alone, which made him very angry.

Creating conflicts is a routine of the program, but it is obviously not suitable for Xu Jinjiang. The program group constantly tested Xu Jinjiang's bottom line, repeatedly annoyed him, and made him lose his temper, achieving the expected results. This not only didn't make the audience hate Xu Jinjiang, but also questioned the script of the program group. Is it really good to fry a program with a person who has been severely depressed? I'm not afraid that he can't bear cyber violence?

For Xu Jinjiang, he doesn't need to make money or gain popularity by programs at all. He just wants to spend more time with his son, but the program group has repeatedly embarrassed him, which makes people very disgusted.

Success can be used for reference, but it cannot be copied. Don't the program group understand that everyone is different and teach students in accordance with their aptitude? Isn't it illegal to put the script for treating children on adults? The fundamental reason for the low score of this program is that the script of the program group was taken wrong, which ruined many good guests.