Naruto Watergate and Jiu Si Nye are both beautiful. Why are Narutos so plain-looking?
Why do you want to say such a passage?
As we all know, there is a kind of inheritance in modern genetics that only happens every other generation. For example, your grandfather has good eyesight and your father has poor eyesight. According to the normal principle, you will inherit your father's vision, which is also bad. But it is with this inheritance that it is possible to make your eyesight better than your father's, because you are your grandfather's gene.
Of course, this statement can be a simple generalization of genetics, which only gives you a preliminary understanding of what atavism is like, without in-depth logical thinking and scientific definition.
Gossip aside, after we understand this truth, we will know that Kishimoto's portrayal of Naruto may be to create characters in such a scientific way.
The benefits of this shaping can first highlight the personality of the characters. For example, Naruto's image is more in line with optimistic and cheerful people, because optimistic and cheerful people will not feel inferior because of their own image, but will pay more attention to it, which is in sharp contrast with Sasuke's handsome image, which is also in line with artistic creation techniques.
Secondly, Oda can describe an unforgettable inspirational story. As we all know, the image of heroes before their fall is impressive, but when they struggle again and again in constant failure, we will be moved by their spirit, and the image of Naruto is more in line with the setting of the protagonist of inspirational stories.
Finally, let the characters have more personality. Who will we think of when we see Sasuke? Kyoya Hibari (mentor)? Hijikata Toushirou (Silver Soul)? Rukawa Kaede (slam dunk)? If you read these cartoons, you will find that they are not only extremely similar in temperament, but also similar in face. What if they don't know and think it's a show? On the other hand, Naruto's face can be remembered at first sight, because his face is very different from other protagonists and has its own personality.
After we know the function of artistic creation, let's look at the problem itself.
Naruto's parents are handsome and beautiful, and gave birth to Naruto, the protagonist with low value. If we infer from realistic science and artistic techniques, then some of Naruto's grandparents should be the same as Naruto.
What is the inference of this statement?
The important evidence is in Naruto's face. As we all know, Naruto's face looks like a cat's beard, which is very distinctive. Where did this image come from? Kishimoto did not explain, which is probably the biggest question of animation. However, we found that Naruto's mother is a thousand-handed family. From the previous generation to Gang Shou, and then to Naruto's mother, such a mark will not appear on their faces. After four generations, there is no such thing, so where did this detail come from?
According to the inference of the goblin king, it comes from four generations of families. Why do you say that?
We can start with Naruto's son Boren. Boren's image has many similarities with the four generations, which also accords with the inference of atavism mentioned above. In this case, can it be concluded that the Watergate family will have a family inheritance similar to atavism?
If there is, Naruto's appearance will get a reasonable and logical explanation. Is it true?/You don't say.
I'm afraid only Shoji can answer this question accurately.