The U.S. military deploys seven aircraft carriers in the Atlantic Ocean

The US military has deployed seven aircraft carriers in the Atlantic Ocean.

The U.S. aircraft carrier battle group has always been a weapon that allows the United States to show off its power in the world. I have also seen various media hyping the U.S. aircraft carrier, boasting that the U.S. aircraft carrier is very powerful, can destroy a medium-sized country, and has high output. , aircraft carrier swarms. However, the performance of the US military is somewhat disappointing: the US aircraft carrier fleet is lying motionless at the door of Iran, military operations in the Pacific have also been reduced, and the US military has not seen any action near Russia. What kind of medicine is the US military selling?

The U.S. Navy has deployed seven aircraft carriers in the Atlantic region, but in fact only one is operational and capable of combat. This undoubtedly reveals that the combat effectiveness of the U.S. aircraft carrier fleet is getting weaker and weaker. It is just a paper tiger and does not have the capabilities it once had. threaten. The status of several other aircraft carriers: either they are busy preparing for decommissioning, or they are paralyzed in the port.

Either there is a malfunction, or the approval is not passed; the only usable aircraft carrier may feel that the Atlantic Ocean has bad feng shui, so come to the Indian Ocean to see Ah San to adjust your mood. In other words, although there are many aircraft carriers, the US military's aircraft carriers are crippled and crippled. The only good one has fled the Atlantic Ocean and is preparing to form a group to fish at the doorstep of Iran. Is the U.S. military really at its wits end to the point of living like a Buddhist? It is worth noting that the U.S. intends to allocate US$3.6 billion to build the wall.

Half of the US construction projects are located in the United States and half are located overseas, and may involve areas such as drones, cyber warfare, and training facilities. It is estimated that the US aircraft carriers will scold their mothers when they hear such an unreliable decision by the military: We are all going to be destroyed, but you are thinking about building a wall. Lang Lang Qiankun is very unreliable!

Don’t worry, think about building a wall. The wall requires 3.6 billion? Do you think that the US military is building the Great Wall and establishing a tourist area on the US-Mexico border as a cultural project? The US military itself claims that half of it is located in the United States, so it may be building a wall; half is still located overseas, which makes people speculate. Does the U.S. still want to embezzle it? What will this overseas part be used for? Is the U.S. Navy fleet repeatedly cut to prepare for something?

U.S. military spending has skyrocketed, but the level of armaments has declined. The U.S. military also buys and sells by force everywhere. When it focuses on an important resource area or energy storage area, it does everything possible to blackmail other countries. When it needs to sell arms, it uses threats and intimidation to force other countries to buy, which makes the U.S. military As if they are very poor, they even have to raise a lot of funds even if they reduce the combat effectiveness of the army. What is this for?

There is only one explanation - the US military does not need its own troops to fight wars, from Afghanistan to Iraq, from Syria In Ukraine, the U.S. military gradually evolved from fighting on its own, to using agents to fight, and then to directly supporting agents to fight. The U.S. military has also withdrawn troops from various regions and gradually reduced the size of its troops. All of this may be a manifestation of its increasing proficiency in "proxy warfare".

Nowadays, with the rise of Russia and other major powers, the people of Latin America are united, and African countries are actively cooperating. The world is becoming more and more prosperous, and the conflicts of interests with the US military are also increasing.

Mexicans, Russians, Eastern Europeans, Turks, etc. are all difficult for the US military. Using troops to suppress the situation has had little effect in the past, but with agents, everything will be much easier to handle. In the past, we had to provide money, people, and supplies, and the methods were sometimes incompatible with the local environment. But the agents knew everything, and the agents were short of money. Half of the US military’s military expenditures are spent overseas. Is this really the reason?