Excuse me, is this really Tibetan Buddhism?
1. physiognomy is the "technique" of Taoism, which means reading palms, faces, geomantic omen, touching bones and measuring characters. . . . And so on, are based on the understanding and application of the Eight Diagrams of Zhouyi. A Buddhist priest, especially one who is so profound that he can be called a "guru" (a monk), is unlikely to concentrate on studying non-religious "techniques". Of course, it does not rule out that he is so profound and knowledgeable. . . . At least I haven't seen it among Tibetan Buddhist monks here in Inner Mongolia.
2. The lamas who have received the Ten Commandments leave the temple for two purposes: pilgrimage and missionary work. Lamas in monasteries live on incense money (giving alms), so lamas who leave monasteries should usually live on giving alms. But authentic monks don't ask others to give alms on their own initiative.
The most suspicious thing about this man is that he has no temple, so where did he receive his precepts? Where did you get the "Dudie"? Without these two, his identity is simply untenable in religion.
3. Are lamas still practicing double cultivation? ! Anyone who has received formal sex education can see the absurdity of "technique" such as harmonizing yin and yang, collecting yin and tonifying yang. This kind of thing does not exist. Yuan Shundi Tuohuan Tiemuer had a record of practicing this technique in history (the most prized). At that time, the Lama said that this technique could prolong life, but Yuan Shundi didn't just live for 5 years? In addition, these techniques were lost in the official history after the Yuan Dynasty, so even if they existed, they should not be an unidentified person.
However, Tibetan Buddhism is Mahayana Buddhism, and the characteristic of this Buddhism is indulgence, which is the biggest feature compared with Hinayana Buddhism in China. According to what you said, he lied when he made it clear.
4. aura. . . . Non-religious, what is good is supernatural, and what is not good is to cheat foreign devils. Tibetan Buddhism stresses cultivation, but even magic has never been called "aura".
in a word, there are too many suspicious things in this man's actions, and the deception is poor. I have an idea. If you have time, you can ask him the following questions yourself or your friend in a curious tone:
1. Does the master have a degree? What degree is it?
2. has the master studied the tripitaka?
3. where is the master of the master?
4. How many branches of Lamaism are there?
The above is the most basic common sense of Lamaism. If he hesitates or speaks insincerely when you ask these questions, then there is no doubt that he is false!
It is the most shameless behavior to pretend that a preacher is cheating by using the characteristics of religion. If this person is false, he will be damned, which is why I answer you.