Absolutely high score reward! People who have read the Three Kingdoms and understand the history of the Three Kingdoms come in and comment! !

This must first be compared with overall strength and contribution to history. This is the general direction. There is no point in arguing about one Lu, two Zhang, and Zhao Yun. You have to first select some leaders, and then select people who have made certain contributions in certain battles or in governing the country. In terms of force, Guan and Zhang were comparable, but Guan Yu guarded Jingzhou for many years. Although he was finally lost, his importance to history was obviously stronger than that of Zhang Fei. Back then, when Liu Bei became king of Hanzhong, the governor he chose was Wei Yan, not Zhang Fei.

History cannot be summarized by games. Maybe games can reflect some characteristics of the character to a certain extent, but there are great limitations.

If we want to select ten people who influence the direction or situation of the Three Kingdoms, Sima Zhao can be shortlisted.

Maybe someone will tell me that Sima Zhao’s military strength is only 74, and his intelligence is only 88. There are a lot of people like him in the Three Kingdoms, how could he be shortlisted.

Game players and readers of "The Romance" have a relatively high evaluation of his father Sima Yi. Some debates even proposed that "Sima Yi defeated Zhuge Liang without fighting", which is the highest level of the art of war. Realm, if according to this statement, wouldn't Sima Yi become the number one in the Three Kingdoms?

Sima Yi is indeed good, but his reign was very short. From the coup in 249 to his death in 251, it only lasted 3 years. The eldest son Sima Shi only lived 4 years longer than his father, and the rest of his life was left to Sima Zhao. Sima Zhao politically reformed laws, advocated thrift, and developed agriculture. Later, Sima Zhao also abolished the farming system that had become a burden to agricultural development. Militarily, Sima Zhao showed his superior strategy in pacifying the Huainan rebellion. Xi Chizhi (who wrote the "Han, Jin, Spring and Autumn Annals") said, "The gentleman said that General Sima went to war, and he could be said to be able to attack with virtue. ... Now one expedition led to three rebellions, and the Wu people were captured in large numbers. They swept through Huaipu and captured prisoners. I won't go into detail about the fact that Sima Zhao took control of Chang'an at the end of 262 and sent the Third Route Army south to destroy Shu. Everyone who has read the novel knows it.

So, I personally think that people like Ju Shou, Tian Feng, Pang Tong, Guo Jia, Cheng Yu, and even Jiang Wei and Zhou Yu are not as good as Sima Zhao. In fact, Zhou Yu is not as good as Lu Su.

This is the first question. After a little discussion, I actually typed so many words.

The second question is about marching and fighting.

The number one ranking is definitely Cao Cao. There is no dispute about this. Cao Cao's military career lasted nearly 40 years, and he had 31 clearly recorded battles, most of which were victorious. He finally unified the vast area of ​​China north of the Yangtze River and Qinling Mountains. Give a few examples. 1. Cao Cao recklessly planned to kill thousands of troops including Wen Chou himself with 600 cavalry. During Cao Cao's time, Cao Cao was very daring to use risks and strategies. 2. In 192 and 193, Cao Cao defeated hundreds of thousands of Qingzhou Yellow Turban troops with a small number. 3. When fighting against Ma Chao and crossing the Yellow River, the 56-year-old Cao Cao took the lead and crossed the river first. Facing the hail of bullets from the Ma army, Cao Cao still sat on the bed without any stage fright. He moved the three armies and allowed the follow-up troops to cross the river smoothly. 4. When he defeated Lu Bu, Cao Cao diverted water to irrigate the city. This is a bit like when Wang Jian destroyed Wei, he diverted water from the Yellow River to irrigate the beams. 5. In the Battle of Guandu, Cao Cao rashly attacked Wuchao with his cavalry. He was decisive, courageous, and brave, similar to Li Shimin in his youth.

Cao Cao also lost battles, but most of them were caused by objective reasons. When he defeated Xu Rong, it was Cao Cao's first battle at this time, and he had few soldiers, so it was normal for him to lose because he had no experience. In the Battle of Chibi, there are too many objective factors in this battle, and even junior high school students know it.

Let’s talk about Zhang Liao.

Game players all know that Zhang Liao's cavalry and spearmen are very powerful, and paired with Lu Bu + Diao Chan, they are invincible. Among Wei's famous generals, his military power is probably among the top three and five. However, Dian Wei's 96 and Xu Chu's 95 are ineffective. Players still like to use 2 cards and 2 Xiahou.

By the way, when he served under Lu Bu, Lu Bu's number one general was Gao Shun, and Zhang Liao was the second.

Zhang Liao had no family background or family influence. He relied solely on his martial arts, bravery and perseverance to first join Ding Yuan, then Dong Zhuo, then Lu Bu, and finally Cao Cao. In the 24th year of Wei Dynasty, he made great military achievements and was recorded in the annals of history. From a commoner to a famous general, I think we can talk about it, what do you think?

If you want to ask me, what are his achievements?

I can’t say that much, I have typed a lot of words.

Finally, let’s talk about a few people.

Lu Su is the person who proposed the "couch policy". His views are several years earlier than Zhuge Liang's "Longzhong Dui" and are more realistic. Zhuge Liang's views are not in line with reality. The wish of "Old Capital" can only be realized in dreams. Later, Gan Ning supplemented Lu Su's opinions and put forward the famous "two-divided world theory", that is, Soochow recovered Jingzhou and Xichuan, and formed a north-south separatist regime with Cao Cao.

General Gan Ning has this constructive opinion, is he not inferior to Zhao Yun?

When Wei Yan was in Hanzhong, he also created the famous "Chongmen Art of War". Later, Wang Ping and Jiang Wei both studied under Wei Yan and were able to guard Hanzhong for more than 40 years. It seems that Wei Yan is also stronger than Zhao Yun. Yo.

Why ignore Lu Kang?

Not only Lu Kang, but also the civil and military emperor Yang Guang, the writer, strategist, politician and reformer Wan Yanliang all ignored that the Jin Kingdom's one emperor through the ages fell to one king in the end. location.

Liu Yan also ignored it.

In the late Han Dynasty, the governor was originally responsible for managing the place, but Liu Yan proposed that it be changed to the state pastoralist who monopolized military, political and economic power. Then several clan ministers each rejected one state, and then the later state came into being. Warlords fight. Liu Yan, who has made such creative contributions, should be given a place. What do you think?

There is also Deng Ai. It's a long story, I'll just say one sentence. Deng Ai, who came from a poor family, relied on his excellent talents and tenacious fighting spirit to rise through the ranks. Although he and Zhong Hui were both executed, their characters were quite different.

I saw what you said about Pang De. After all, he came out to fight Guan Yu with a coffin, and the coffin was prepared for Guan Yu. However, I would like to talk about Yu Jin. As the only false yue in the Wei Kingdom, the contest between Yu Jin and Guan Yu, the only false yue in the Shu Kingdom, was so embarrassing that some books even said that Yu Jin was a crime other than war. , as the commander-in-chief does not understand the terrain, topography, and weather, how can he talk about crimes other than war?

Let’s just talk about these

I don’t specialize in writing books. I just write whatever comes to my mind