Xiao Sheng is preparing to write Xian Xia's novel "Fix the Truth" recently, but I am confused about the name. What should I do if I remember most of them?

Then I'll tell you, the main thing is to cultivate immortality! I am an old bookworm who has been wandering in major online bookstores for six years, so a reader wants to tell you what readers like, and those eight achievements can't be wrong!

Personally, I don't like Zhu Xian. Needless to say after reading it. Later, it was more romantic than romance ... Although it can impress readers, I am afraid that I will feel alienated after being moved. ......

People who cultivate immortals, such as immortals and immortals, are more suitable for social survival. The protagonist will not affect himself because of his feelings. They are like an old fox or a street vendor who knows how to bend and stretch. They will not help others for no reason, such as you and me, unless they are particularly familiar with them. It is impossible to ask them for help without being overweight.

It's like when you pass a dark street or a sparsely populated path, and a group of people are beating up a student, which is usually the case in novels.

Most protagonists clap their chests to help the student. Therefore, if this person is not a powerful person, it is Superman or a hero; But what if this is realistic? Do heroes exist? You passed by here and found five or six people beating a student. Will you rush up without hesitation? You won't. Most of the time, you will watch the excitement, and so will I. If the person who was beaten was someone close to you, you wouldn't rush up. You will call a group of people who are worse than these bad guys or who can drive them away. Instead of being stupid enough to rush up and get beaten, this is reality; )

Therefore, instead of writing alienation, it is better to write novels close to the lives of ordinary people, which can resonate with readers.

Of course, it's up to you to write about your feelings or cultivate immortality. Others can only give their own opinions, and whether you agree with a respondent's opinion ..... only you know.

But no matter what you write, as long as it looks good, there will be readers, even if there is criticism. After all, some people don't like Jin Yong's works.

......................................................................................

About the title:

First of all, books are precious in simplicity. Those who can use one word need not use two words, those who can use two words need not use three words, those who can use three words need not use four words, and those who can use four words need not use five words. Because only conciseness can be powerful and word-of-mouth can be facilitated. Maybe you have many reasons to give a longer name, such as it can describe it more accurately and convey more information. That's more accurate, but no one can remember it, and it will blur the title. Let me give you an example. There is a super bestseller called "The Greatest Salesman in the World" (if I were the planning editor of this book, I would also delete the word "world", which is totally unnecessary). How would you feel if the title of this book was changed to Some Great Quotes and Philosophical Stories about Success in Life and Marketing yourself? So, remember, the title of the book doesn't have to be accurate, but it should be very powerful and you can remember it as soon as you listen.

Secondly, if the topic can convey some human feelings, try to convey some human feelings, because computer books are cold enough. If a title sounds like talking to a wall, not many people will be interested in reading it, but if the title sounds like talking to you, most readers will stop and browse curiously to see what this little book really wants to say to me. This only involves a simple psychological factor.

Finally, I want to emphasize once again that the title of a book has never been to pursue accuracy, scope, meaning, and the "readership orientation" that most editors like to emphasize. Almost all planning editors like to move out the word "readership positioning" anytime and anywhere. It seems that only by pulling out this word can he show that he is really in the business of planning and editing. Whether to use the word "readership positioning" frequently is one of the rules to judge whether an editor is out of tune. If you are planning, there is a way to take a small step forward quickly on the road of planning, and that is-forget the word as soon as possible.

Finally, I use four words to summarize the principle of the topic: reliable, powerful, concise and unforgettable.