Why do people say that Chinese medicine is pseudoscience?

If TCM is a kind of science, it is just a kind of specific knowledge under the guidance of philosophy. With a kind of attachment, it can ascend to heaven and deceive many people, but the eyes of the masses are discerning after all. Science should have specific basis and strong repeatability. The results may be useful, or just for fun. Philosophy is largely a genius idea of some people in an era, some of which can be verified, and some may not be verified until several years later. Need facts to prove it. Experience, in a nutshell, is some very popular skills or knowledge that is considered very wise in repetition. Traditional Chinese medicine lacks the link from experience to science, but is directly linked to philosophy. This is hard for people who are used to science to accept. Moreover, from the development of Chinese medicine, many Chinese medicine practitioners are also familiar with the history of classics, and it is also possible to find a historical background by directly connecting experience with philosophy. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is said to be pseudoscience when it lacks something, and science may never exist in many aspects of TCM.