China Naming Network - Eight-character query< - Yu Jian got the answer.

Yu Jian got the answer.

I recommend Stealing the Ming Dynasty, a very serious novel about the history of the Ming Dynasty.

Not to lose to those things in the Ming Dynasty.

Excerpts . .

. . . Facing the fiercest enemy of the Han nationality for thousands of years, the Qing dynasty slaughtered nearly 200 million to 40 million Han people after entering the customs. In the next 300 years, mass killings occurred one after another, with more victims than all the massacres in the past two thousand years combined.

He also faced the most ferocious enemy in Mongolian history-Manchu implemented a salary reduction policy for Mongolians, as long as Mongolian ministries exceeded the male ceiling. Then it is necessary to kill the redundant males by drawing lots to reduce their size. This indiscriminate slaughter even included the hardcore Horqin Mongols of the Aisin Giorlo family, with a male ceiling of 80,000. The slave chief and his son, the slave chief Xuan, were equally rude when they slaughtered Horqin. In just 40 years, only the male of Horqin Mongolia, their father and son slaughtered 300,000.

He is also the enemy of the Hui people-Manchu has carried out continuous genocide against various ministries of the Hui people, and formulated the policy of "leading the Han people with the Hui people and controlling the Hui people with the Han people" to provoke racial hatred. Encourage ethnic vendettas within the Hui nationality.

He is also the sworn enemy of Miao nationality. ...

He is also the sworn enemy of the Yi people. ...

Huangshi is also the enemy of Chinese civilization;

The Ming dynasty had brilliant achievements in music art, such as the law of twelve averages put forward by the Ming dynasty, which was the cornerstone of musical.ly until the primitive times of Huangshi-but now it can't survive in the land where it appeared because it was banned by the Qing dynasty.

The development of medicine in Ming Dynasty was difficult. Chinese medicine, for example, proposed for the first time that people think with their brains instead of their hearts-but because these new theories were banned by the Qing Dynasty, they lost the opportunity for further development.

The Ming dynasty translated primitive geometry ... all the women in the Ming dynasty knew that the ball might be round, so they argued about it and wrote down notes ... Some people in the Ming dynasty wanted to write technical books. Introduce how steel was tempered-these books were banned in Qing Dynasty.

Slave owner Fu Lin opened a literary inquisition once a year on average, his son once every five years, his grandson once every two years on average, and his great-grandson Li Hong actually opened a literary inquisition twice a year on average!

Li Hong, the slave owner, also compiled the Four Ku Encyclopedia, announcing that only 3,000 books can exist in China, while nearly 7,000 books are banned without titles, and countless books are banned without titles-God, don't say that China has been brilliant for 2,000 years. In the Ming Dynasty alone, there were 20,000 imperial books approved for publication by the Emperor Apocalypse alone.

In Huangshi's personal impression, when we turn to the history of the Qing Dynasty, we can only see two words: ignorance and betrayal. From the Qing Dynasty to the Revolution of 1911, there was never a scientific celebrity born in China in the world history, and there was not even a technological invention belonging to China. During its more than 200 years of rule, this regime actually signed 1 100 traitorous treaties, with an average of three treaties a year!

The great civilization created by our Chinese ancestors has been destroyed to the point where it cannot be revived by our own efforts. It must draw nutrition from foreign civilizations to get back on its feet.

Numerous books are lost in this darkness, and I don't even know what my ancestors created; When Jiannu slandered Daming as an ignorant country like them, I couldn't even find enough concrete reasons to refute it.

- .