What safety facilities do you think are needed for activities in the suburbs?

1. Risk classification (risk identification category)? There are many hidden dangers in the grinding process. I try to classify them from the following basic levels: 1, hiking: ankle sprain, cramp, difficulty breathing, fatigue, blisters on feet, falls, car accidents, hunger, lack of water, etc. 2. Mountaineering: scratches, knife wounds, falls (here, a small drop on a cliff or hillside will not lead to death), cliffs, snake venom, stings, animal bites, falling rocks, landslides, suffocation, frostbite, lack of oxygen, avalanches, etc. 3. Falling into the water: suffocation, cramp, drowning, collision, drowning, etc. 4. Weather: dehydration, heatstroke, colds, lightning strikes, sunburn, etc. 5. Human aspects: robbery, food poisoning, drinking water poisoning, etc. Sudden death is hard to prevent. ? The risks identified above are obviously unprofessional and far from enough. Medical students and experienced old donkeys should have the most say. ? As for what is the final determination of the basic risk, it is definitely a matter for managers to decide.

2. Risk classification (risk identification category)? Night walking, flood, getting lost, thunderstorm, etc. These are not basic risks, but "combined risks". For example, getting lost is not terrible, because once you find the way quickly, nothing will happen, but there will be risks such as hunger, falling off a cliff, lack of water and drinking water poisoning. ? I think the relationship between basic risk and portfolio risk is similar to that between atoms and molecules, and the significance of defining portfolio risk lies in its operability in practice (the specific operation will be discussed later). ? The classification of risks should be based on the consequences of risks. The so-called consequences are nothing more than minor injuries, serious injuries, disability and death. ? Risk is determined by points, which is easy to manage, because data is the most convincing! For example, the risk of sprain, abrasion, drowning and cold is 1 point, cramp, stab wound and dehydration are 2 points, falling off a cliff, drowning, heatstroke and food poisoning are 3 points, and direct fatal accidents such as car accident, falling off a cliff, drowning and lightning strike are 4 points, which is difficult to define, but the worst result is death. ? As for how to quantitatively analyze various risks, this is naturally a matter for managers to decide on their own, and opinions cannot be completely unified. I hope everyone agrees that this is a fantasy.

Third, the risk response measures (risk prevention)? In this regard, various websites have done a lot of work, and many risks (or portfolio risks) have ready-made countermeasures, which only need to be sorted out again, so that people who have safety awareness and want to learn can see at a glance. It is best to explain every basic risk one by one (of course, some extremely common risks do not need to be explained, such as breathing difficulties, hunger, water shortage, etc.); Some basic risks need to be analyzed, such as falling, food poisoning, etc., because there are many factors that form this risk and need to be elaborated one by one. The purpose of doing this risk response measure is to let the new donkeys strengthen their own promotion, avoid hurting themselves, and avoid involving the website in future outdoor sports. ? These risk countermeasures can establish column management! It is convenient for people who are responsible for their own lives to search and learn. ? I hate and even despise those guys who pour water into the safety post! You read it yourself. Why do you have to say such nonsense as "writing well", "benefiting a lot" and "learning"? This kind of nonsense is as disgusting as an advertisement inserted in the middle of some wonderful TV programs! People who want to learn see a good post with n pages and think it's all valuable information, but most of it is rubbish! Admittedly, there are some constructive suggestions. If managers think these suggestions are pertinent, they can be enriched into the original text. If they are not sure, they can stay for a while so that learners can identify themselves. If it is irrigation nonsense, I hope the manager will resolutely delete it! The purpose of deletion is not to affect others' learning, in other words, to maintain a good learning environment. When people study in the library, they certainly don't want to be disturbed by a group of noisy people.

Fourth, first aid training (risk prevention)? There are many risks and many donkeys, so it is impossible and unnecessary for everyone to train. ? But the team leader must be trained. The content of training is not self-help, but rescue! Donkeys go to the safety column to read self-help things, but it is impossible to save things without training and mastery. This is also one of the responsibilities of the team leader. I believe that no team leader wants one of his team members to die in the accident. ? The contents of rescue include: bandaging, artificial respiration, snake injury rescue, etc. Professional doctors still have the right to speak. ? Training can be regular or temporary. Temporary training, if too many people sign up, will definitely give priority to the team leader, quasi-team leader and collaborator in turn; If there are still places, you can consider letting other donkey friends participate. The so-called regular training (if possible) means that those who have passed the training and won the title of website leader should be retrained from time to time to maintain the proficiency of rescue, avoid making mistakes at critical moments and regret for life.

Verb (abbreviation of verb) activity classification (risk identification category)? What are the concepts of standard level and challenge level? Every website has its own definition. But does a new donkey know? Is that clear? Even an old donkey may not know the difference. And basically, the theme is intensity, not risk and technology. ? My opinion: speak with data. For example, 1: What are the risks at the top of Wu Tong Mountain on the century-old road? According to the risks listed above, they include ankle sprain (1), dyspnea (1), fall (1), water shortage (1) and abrasion (65444). ? Assuming that the activity with a risk index of 5~ 10 is defined as "standard level", then it is a standard level activity to follow the old road for a hundred years in general weather. If it is a thunderstorm, you need to add cold (1) and lightning strike (4), and the risk index becomes 13, which is obviously not the standard level. ? Example 2: What are the risks in hot summer? According to the above risk database, risks include sprain (1), cramp (2), dyspnea (1), exhaustion (2), foot blisters (1), falls (1) and car accidents.