We are going to demolish the countryside in Suqian. Do we want money or a room?

There are laws to follow for house demolition and expropriation on rural collective land. Article 48 of the Land Management Law stipulates three compensation methods for villagers to choose freely. First, the legal first choice is to re-select the homestead for new resettlement. Second, resettlement housing placement. Third, monetary compensation. A single monetary compensation, because of the wild speculations, may be judicial demolitions. The purpose of house demolition and expropriation is to improve living conditions, that is, the bigger the demolition, the better (referring to the registered area of homestead certificate and real estate license). What kind of compensation method to choose is the most important issue in demolition. This is the state's use of laws to protect people's property rights. I hope everyone can learn and understand the law. Protect your legitimate rights and interests with the law. * * * With the construction of the motherland beautiful countryside! ! ! !

Since my home is also demolished, I have a deep understanding of taking money or taking a house.

My relatives moved in 2005, that is, they took money. I remember that I was very happy to take about 1 10,000.

According to the square of his house, he won't take money, and he can get two suites then. Because I bought a large set at that time, 145 people thought it was enough, three rooms, and the extra money was deposited in the bank to get interest.

But who would have thought that the house price has gone up too fast? Now my grandchildren have grown up and want to find a girlfriend, but the family is like this, and there are many inconveniences in housing, so I still suggest high cost performance.

You have to weigh this yourself.

If you want a house, the resettlement house for you is definitely not so good, for example, the location is partial and you are not given a real estate license.

You can buy your own property if you want money, but now the house price is very high, so you have to add some yourself.

If you want a house, it is enough to live in it; The rest is for money. In this way, both the house and the money are available, and the best of both worlds are achieved.

If your house is not just needed and your children have a house to live in, then you need money, and you can use it to make some investments!

Because, according to the present situation, it is impossible for the house to continue to increase in value by a large margin. First, the central government has repeatedly stressed that "houses are for living, not for speculation"! Set the tone for the real estate market; Secondly, today's real estate market has become saturated, important houses are still in the countryside, and there is little room for future appreciation. Generally speaking, choosing money is more affordable!

However, if the house is just needed and you want to go back to the countryside to support the elderly in the future, then I suggest you have a house. Although there is not much room for appreciation, in the short term, the house is still the worst well-deserved "commodity"!

So, choose according to your actual situation!

Hello, my friend! After reading your description, I think it's best to take the house away. First, the demolition and resettlement itself is the transfer of housing location, which is more reflected in sharing worries and dedication for the government. Second, due to government subsidies, the price of resettlement houses is lower than the market, so there is a lot of room for appreciation to balance with the market. In the short term, interest can't keep up with the appreciation of the house. Third, the most important thing is that the demolition houses are often concentrated. Your relatives, your aura, your roots and your homesickness are all there! Haha, that's too serious, got it!

Rural housing demolition generally involves housing compensation interests and resettlement interests. Money compensation may not be worth it.

In fact, it mainly depends on whether you have a house personally. If there is, asking for money is definitely good. If you don't buy a house in the city, you might as well buy a house. After all, the house price is expensive and the resettlement fee is not enough to buy a house. I moved, too. Just me. I want this money, so I can go back to my hometown and live in the countryside. Children have a house, so it depends on everyone. After all, the location of resettlement houses is not very good. Commercial housing can buy my favorite location, apartment type and room type.

I think it is better to have a house. For old people, asking for money is waiting for death.

We will also be demolished and located in the flooded surrounding areas. At present, the compensation is relatively low, and the preliminary calculation can only pay 200,000. It is basically a dream to expect this money to buy a house on the street. To say the least, buying a house in the town also needs to empty savings.

It doesn't matter if we young people go back. Our parents are fine, but our grandparents are even more embarrassed.

The monthly income of 600 million people is less than 1000 yuan. How many old people are there? They can also retire to farm and grow vegetables to make a living. Tear it down immediately and let them go.

Three roads. The first one is to live with my children and grandchildren.

Second, find yourself a job and join the army of scavengers. But because enterprises don't want old people and security properties want young people, there are really not many people who can get in.

Third, it takes time to go to a nursing home.

To put it bluntly, if they choose money, but can't get a house, the house price is getting higher and higher, and the cost of living is getting higher and higher. Without skills, it is about equivalent to being abandoned by the city.

How to choose between choosing a house and withdrawing money, I hope to be cautious and don't rush into it.

Depending on the decision of real estate tax reform, monetary demolition is a good choice if vacant tax is levied and there are enough living conditions.