What do you think of Hillary's defeat?
This article was written on the second day of the American election. It used to be a fair while the iron is hot. However, although it has caused a lot of troubles, it is a cross-border fireworks for China people. Double 1 1 are red roses and white roses in front of us. When it comes out, it becomes mosquito blood and rice grains. So, to sum up, we omit some empty sentences and make excuses for ourselves. In a word, half of the following articles were written the day after the election, and half were written after the double 1 1, which can be described as a creation with China characteristics.
Almost everyone knows that an important rule of writing is to get to the point. Last night, the official WeChat account was close to the screen. After all, it is the presidential election in the United States, and people on earth can't care too much. Think about what I wrote last April. It's really like yesterday. Sure enough, Hillary really took part in a conversation at the first sound of spring thunder? (2015-04-1218: 25: 34)], but the outcome has been decided in an instant. Looking back at that article, it's not that I believe Hillary will win and women's politics is full of positive energy, but that I show great pessimism and disappointment about the success of women's politics. ! It seems that memory is really unreliable, and it still needs to be recorded in writing, such as writing articles every day (manual comparison).
Looking back at the old articles, we should not only have a further understanding of the abuse of writing in recent years, but also lament Hillary's failure.
Many articles on this topic appeared overnight, and each author was a pile of arguments, as if turning on the time machine and predicting that miracles would happen.
Individuals dare not prey on the United States, but can only say what they call random thoughts.
-I want to remember the faint secant after double 1 1
In line with the unchangeable law that a male pig and a female pig will never die, and a personal official WeChat account will never be wrong, I saw a bunch of official WeChat account articles the next morning. Not surprisingly, I knew Trump would win. Hehe, all kinds of polls and interviews were like setting an agenda, and they all shouted in unison that Hillary would definitely win those people unless they were Martians. Well, it doesn't matter whether you spit or not. Importantly, this election provided more than N students with topics for their master's/doctoral theses. Well, that's not important either. It is important to sum up experience and learn lessons. Although there is nothing new under the sun, all kinds of bridges and dog blood have happened in history. However, in any case, we still have to remember one thing, that is, "anything is possible." Looking at the disintegration of the former Soviet Union and the election of Trump, it is inevitable that people will have a "big surprise". After the surprise, it is to find the reason, whether it is a constellation or a tarot card, a water reversal or a horoscope. In short, from the psychological protection mechanism, human beings can always find a bunch of reasons to convince themselves and others. No matter how incredible things are, people can always make a complete statement.
Well, a lot of idle salt tables, that man said so much. What do you want to say? Since there is enough preheating on it to hint at how unreliable his statement is, it's time to serve the main course.
Hillary is very good, very good, but in some ways it may seem a little too good. Born in a rich family, graduated from a prestigious school, a famous lawyer, the governor's wife, the first lady, and a female senator, she is the legendary "other people's child" that parents use to educate their children, but it is hard to say whether the compared children will be happy or like her. In fact, such top students are more likely to give people a feeling of being out of reach. In the eyes of the general public, these elites and themselves live in two worlds, and they don't understand our troubles at all. Here are the facts to prove it. Hillary said in her private speech that she didn't understand the life of the poor. I believe she is serious. So you see, although he is a billionaire, Trump, who has a strange hairstyle, a wide suit and an outspoken mouth, is much more "grounded" than Hillary. Although it looks a little dark and humorous, Hillary Clinton, who has exquisite makeup and exquisite words during the debate, really looks tall, so we can say here that it turns out that the consequences of not seriously practicing the mass line are more serious.
So, in the end, it seems to prove two things indirectly. First, it is right for the countryside to surround the cities, and long live the mass line. Second, looking for hope from despair, life will eventually be brilliant. By the way, you can also buy two for one and a bowl of chicken soup: always believe that good things are about to happen.
PS: At the last egg time, there was a true story about Hillary's husband, a poor boy born in Comrade Clinton:
I remember in the presidential election of 1992, when Clinton and Bush were debating, a middle-aged black woman asked me a question, saying that I was an unemployed single mother, with no money, no job, children to support and a very difficult life. How do you help people like us? When Clinton answered this question, he stepped down from the podium, walked up to the lady, touched his chest, and said the first thing to her: "I feel your pain" (I can feel your pain). She was moved to tears. I was deeply moved, too. I think many voters in front of the TV must be very moved. This is not in any textbook, and Clinton did it so naturally. In contrast, George H.W. Bush seems to lack sympathy and understanding for the people's suffering. Voters in the same situation as that black woman will definitely vote for Clinton. His last presidential term has a lot to do with his understanding of voters.