Introduction of comprehensive evaluation method of bidding?

Comprehensive evaluation method is adopted in bidding? Comprehensive evaluation method is one of the two basic bid evaluation methods widely used in government procurement at present, and the other is the lowest bid evaluation method. Taking Zhong Da Consulting as an example, the following explains the basic contents of the comprehensive evaluation method for architects' bids:

A, the bid evaluation method:

1. The comprehensive evaluation method is adopted in this tender evaluation, that is, on the premise of meeting the substantive requirements of the tender documents, after comprehensive evaluation according to the bid evaluation standards and various factors stipulated in the tender documents for construction projects, the bidder with the highest total score of bid evaluation is taken as the winning candidate of the corresponding bid section.

2. Each member of the Bid Evaluation Committee shall independently evaluate and evaluate the technical part of the bidding documents of all effective bidders in the form of scoring (the calculation result shall be rounded to two decimal places).

Statistical summary of judges' scores (except price). If the number of judges is less than 5 (including 5), the score shall be directly calculated by arithmetic average; If the number of judges is more than 5, the arithmetic average score shall be calculated after removing the highest score and the lowest score.

3. If there are two or more bidders with the highest total score in a bid section, the bidder with lower bid price will be given priority as the winning candidate of the bid section. If the bidding price is the same, the notary office will determine the winning candidate by drawing lots.

Two. Price: (price weight 30 points)

The bid quotation that enters the bid evaluation procedure, meets the requirements of the tender documents and has the lowest quotation is the bid evaluation benchmark price (which shall not exceed the procurement budget price), and its price is divided into 30 points out of 100. The price scores of other bidders are calculated according to the following formula: bid quotation score = (bid evaluation benchmark price/bid quotation) x price weight value X 100 (price weight value is 30%).

Three, product and material quality (42 points)

1, brand of main materials (at least including plate, hardware, paint, etc. ); The judges will score in 4~ 10.

2 products and main raw materials, steel plate, powder and other test reports. (Within the validity period): 65438+ 0 point for each item provided, with a maximum of 6 points;

3, the advanced comparison of production level (output, manufacturing technology, testing methods, etc. ) 4 points.

4. 20 points for the sample, mainly evaluated by the judges in terms of appearance, material and technology, ranging from 2 to 20 points;

5. Supply and delivery date: 2 points for meeting the bidding documents;

Iv. comprehensive evaluation of the company (18):

1, company reputation comparison (9 points)

(1) national registered trademark certificate of bidding product brand (2 points)

(2) Annual financial audit report issued by a third-party accounting firm (1 copy 1 minute, 2 copies with 2 points).

(3) Iron and steel products industry standard-setting enterprises (1 min)

(4) Famous brand enterprises at or above the prefecture level (including prefecture-level cities) (1 minute)

(5) Famous furniture enterprises at or above the provincial level (including provincial level) (1 minute)

(6) Employees pay three gold certificates (1 minute) and enterprise engineer certificates (more than three persons) (1 minute) with a maximum of 2 points.

2, sales performance comparison (7 points)

(1) Since 2005, the bidder has scored 1 point for each project with a contract amount of ≥ 1 10,000, with a maximum of 4 points; (The original sales contract must be provided in the tender, otherwise no score will be scored. )

(2) The annual sales of shelf products since 2005 issued by the audit department at or above the municipal level (including prefecture-level cities) is more than 20 million (2 points)

(3) Comparison of standardization and completeness of bid documents (1) (0.5 points will be deducted if the original and copy are not indicated on the cover of bid documents).

3. The registered capital of the bidder is more than or equal to 5 million yuan (2 points).

V. After-sales service (maximum score 10):

1, completeness of service system and comparison of technical strength (1)

2. The warranty period is 2 points; ≥5 years, 2 points; ≥3 years, 1 minute, others will not be scored. (2 points)

3, installation plan, maintenance team introduction (2 points)

4, maintenance response time and completion of maintenance time commitment (the shortest time, and guaranteed 2 points, the rest of the corresponding 2 points).

5, preferential terms (maximum score 3 points)

Compare whether there are other preferential conditions and technical advantages. If there is, the judges will score at their discretion, if not, they will not score.

For more information about bid writing and improving the winning rate, click on the bottom customer service for free consultation.