What are Woods' historical allusions? How will future generations commemorate him?
Wu Qi was born in an ominous year and died in the 21st year (38 1 year). In the early Warring States period, Zuo was a native of Weiguo (now Dingtaoxi, Shandong). Zeng Shen was selected as a teacher. He was an official in Shandong and later entered Wei. Wei Wenhou used it as a general to attack five cities of Qin and defend the North River against Qin. Later, jealous of Wei Xianggong's uncle, he went to Chu to mourn the king, taking him as a gentleman and carrying out political reform and reform, which aroused the resentment of noble ministers. Mourning the death of the king was destroyed by the etiquette of the princes, and Wu Qi became a general. He is brave and good at fighting, and he is strict with his soldiers. He shared joys and sorrows with the soldiers and was deeply influenced by them. To understand the law and judge the order, to serve the country and enrich the people, and to make outstanding contributions. In history, he is as famous as Sun Wu as a strategist and Shang Yang as a thinker.
Woods' core content is "cultivating one's morality internally and managing the army externally", and he believes that politics and national defense are closely linked. "Virtue" means advocating "Tao, righteousness, courtesy and benevolence" to rectify the army and the masses. I feel that "the people are fasting in the palace and kissing their people." "The people are all my kings, not my neighbors, so the war won." The so-called "armament" means that our country should attach great importance to prevention, "simply recruit talented people" and basically build a strong army, so as to be safe. Woods divided wars into five categories: just soldiers, Qiang Bing, just soldiers, violent soldiers and rebel soldiers. It advocates a just war to resist ruthless and unjust confrontation, and it advocates a cautious attitude towards war and resists extortion.
In the aspect of army building, the concept of "if the soldiers are not in the crowd, governing them will win" and "using the way of fighting and taking lessons as the basis" are clearly put forward. Governance means paying attention to the training of troops and ensuring that "you are polite when you are alive, you will always have strength, you can't get in, you can't catch up when you return, you are expensive before, and you are orderly up and down." Although they are not in the formation, they are scattered "and" wherever they go, there is no place in the world. " It is stipulated that outstanding talents should be selected and recruited, soldiers should be valued, and those who have the ambition to destroy the enemy should be regarded as the technical backbone, and then "join the ranks" to give special care to their parents and wives. Canon is education and training.
"Woods" believes that in the management of soldiers, we should put the lessons in the first place, "teach them by ethics and encourage them by righteousness", so that the troops can feel ups and downs, be proud of their death on the battlefield and be ashamed of their retreat, and ensure that "people are happy to listen when they give orders, fight when they do things, and die when they encounter blades". In military training, Woods clearly put forward a set of training methods, including individual skills, formation, ingenuity and other different levels. First, train the technical backbone, gradually expand it, and finally form the three armed forces.
So what do you think of this? Welcome to express your views and ideas!