Was Teacher Zhong, who was reported and expelled from Xiao She De, unjust or not?

From various aspects, the middle school teacher who was reported at the beginning of "Xiao She De" is actually not too unfair. This issue should be viewed from two aspects. The following is my own personal opinion. ?

First, from the perspective of his injustice. As a teacher, the content he taught in the classroom was not inappropriate, and he also made it clear during the negotiation with the principal that the knowledge he taught in the classroom was not omitted, and all the knowledge he taught in the classroom was completed. The teaching content is taught according to the textbook rules. Therefore, from a professional teacher's perspective, he did not make any mistakes. What he said in class was what he should say as a teacher, and there was nothing omitted or redundant. So from this aspect, he did nothing wrong as a teacher. Even though he didn't make any mistakes, he was wronged by his parents, which led to him losing his job. From this perspective, he was very unjust. ?

Secondly, from the perspective of not being unfair, as a teacher, he should ensure the quality of teaching and can also talk about some knowledge beyond the textbooks in class. This is what a teacher should do to teach and resolve doubts, but he did not tell the class about his choice to open a cram school outside. The Education Bureau expressly stipulates that teachers are not allowed to make up lessons privately, so he is said to have violated the Education Bureau. Any violation of the express provisions will definitely lead to corresponding punishment. Therefore, there are certain reasons why Home Improvement reported him, and as the parents said, if they say that they did not do such a thing, there is no evidence for the parents to report him. It was precisely because of the cram school he opened outside and the dangerous regulations of the Education Bureau that parents took advantage of him, so he was reported. It was precisely for this reason that the principal was unable to save him and eventually expelled him. So from the perspective that he violated the regulations and opened a cram school, he was actually not unjust. ?

Thirdly, from the perspective of being wronged, as a primary school mathematics teacher, he is supposed to teach primary school knowledge in the classroom and has no obligation to talk about junior high school knowledge. knowledge. In order to require their children to learn more advanced knowledge, many parents choose to go to cram schools outside to make up lessons and let the teachers explain some junior high school knowledge. This is originally a very stressful learning experience for the children. For some ordinary students, It's also very unfair. So he opened cram schools outside to teach some junior high school knowledge to some students who voluntarily studied. It’s not that I can’t understand it. Just as parents said, in order to support the family, you can also open a cram school to earn some extra money. Although the Education Bureau expressly stipulates that it is not allowed, the teacher does not violate the professional ethics of the teaching profession, so it is different from this aspect.