Problems and perfection of judicial expertise system —— How to standardize the selection of expertise institutions

First, the court appointed

On the condition that it is initially appointed by the court with the consent of both parties. If established, the court can choose any appraisal institution. The advantage is that the court can choose the appraisal institution that it is familiar with, so that the judge can know fairly well in the trial and reduce misjudgment. The disadvantage is that if the judge has problems, then the parties are not allowed to fully exercise their rights.

Second, it was originally designated by both parties.

The condition is that both parties require to go to the designated appraisal institution for appraisal. If it is established, the court must designate this institution and cannot choose freely. Advantages, fair, because you chose it yourself, and you bear all the consequences yourself. It is rare to see the disadvantages, because the plaintiff chooses the defendant to deny, and the defendant chooses the plaintiff to deny.

Third, shake the number immediately.

Is to draw lots. Advantages, human factors are uncontrollable. There are many shortcomings. First, there are no conditions for the current lottery. As long as the appraisal center signs up, everyone can participate in the lottery. This way seems good, but it is not, because the appraisal center is divided into qualifications, but it doesn't matter when you draw lots. Maybe this kind of situation needs to go to the national appraisal agency, but if you give the municipal qualification, you can't shake it any more and you can't complain. Second, the business scope of each appraisal center is different. Maybe only two organizations can do this project, but you need to draw lots among 20 organizations. You can only pray for good luck.